A letter regarding Paula Vennells, Justin Welby and the Church of England

  22/05/2024

Dear Recipients, 

As ever, excuse the length of this. 

Letters to the senior leaders in the Church of England fall on deaf ears and they are resoundingly, spectacularly bad at reading the room, they have no contact with the general public aside from PR shows mainly involving dignitaries or vulnerable groups who they use to try to glorify themselves, while correspondence is usually ignored or receives a token response which isn't directly from the senior leaders but from their staff. With these things in mind, it is small wonder that the Church of England is not relevant to most of the population of the UK, and that their influence over politics is increasingly seen as self-interest and corruption to suit the interests of the church. 

Certain Bishops make a huge song and dance about vulnerable groups, for example the Bishops of Manchester and Liverpool, but they ignore correspondence, this is how the Church of England operates, on a one way street which should lead to a dead end for them. If these people don't even have the humanity to interact with the population apart from as show-offs, they are certainly not representing Christ to us. 

The combined PR stunt of the two unsuitable Archbishops, Justin Welby and Stephen Cotterell regarding the election was astounding. 'Be kind'? Was it kind of Justin Welby to interfere in the last election with a smear campaign against Jeremy Corbyn, an open and very blatant interference in the election for which the House of Lords failed to sanction him? No, and Justin Welby and Stephen Cotterell are not kind, the latter was elected to suit Justin Welby and wasn't even suitable to be a Bishop or clergyman, with his foul language and unresolved misconducts. Welby himself has inflicted very deliberate and lasting cruelty leading to death of abuse victims, and right now the victims of John Smyth have been waiting for four years for the report on their case, as Welby is significantly implicated as well as other senior leaders and the legal battles to protect them are preventing justice or closure of any kind for the victims. Welby is said to have enabled his friend John Smyth, leading to the death of one of Smyth's alleged victims and denying the other victims justice. 

Justin Welby has never been known to be kind, he is one of the biggest high profile narcissists that the UK has ever known, and every PR stunt, every interference in politics and current affairs is about him, not about the church he was supposed to lead but never has, not about the church of England apart from its status as an excuse for wicked men and women to be exempt from the law. The church of England is an ongoing act of deceit, deceiving the rest of the world to think that it is a Christian church and accepted or wanted by the people of England. It isn't, the deceit has worn thin in recent years, while Justin Welby focuses on using his position to meet his own needs at the expense of all vulnerable groups and not least the victims of the Cburch of England.

Stephen Cotterell, the terrible successor to that arrogant man who thought he had a right to a peerage and played the race card, having covered up abuse at the expense of victims, is widely known for blocking abuse victims, concerned people and advocates when they contact Bishopsthorpe as his predecessor also did, this obviously is not kind, in a similar way that his treatment of congregants before he was unsuitably made Archbishop were not kind. These men are ludicrous in telling people to 'be kind'. I think they think they fool the old and naive who still haunt the almost empty churches, and it keeps the money and behests coming in. 

Was it the Rector of Liverpool parish church who resigned recently and included safeguarding in his reasons? Nice of him to care, but he was complicit, as all senior leaders are. They know very well what goes on and what is done to victims for speaking up, essentially all victims who speak up regarding abuse in the church of England are branded for life to one degree or another through the church's abuse of their enmeshment with all authorities and judiciary, so it was nice of the man to mention safeguarding, but he did nothing about it and instead escaped with his own skin presumably intact. Unless this was another 'removal' resignation/retirement like a number of others in the Church of England in the past decade. 

Paula Vennells has horrified and disgusted the nation with her lies and crocodile tears in recent days, her behaviour is an insult to victims and echoes the same behaviour by all senior Church of England leaders, where they repeat that tired script about 'brave victims', and the rest of the PR firms' worn out tosh despite being culpable but never held to account for their part in harming victims. As I said, senior leaders don't lower themselves to communicate with the common people, and thus are seemingly unaware of how sick everyone is of their script. Communication is ignored and they keep on churning out lies and contradictions and crocodile tears. 

Some years back, campaigners asked the Bishop to investigate Vennells, and he did what the church do, obstructed by saying that 'If he was given some evidence of her wrongdoing, he would, but not before then', and when the matter really hit the headlines because the Post Office victims didn't give up, there he was with his fawning PR stunt about being a Postmaster's son, as if the general public was stupid and trying to curry favour and sympathy for himself. Most of what is released into the press by Justin Welby and senior leaders relies on the general public being stupid, especially as they, Welby the most, contradict themselves constantly. Just for example, Paul Butler aiding abusers and harming victims while using children's issues as PR for himself by pretending to care, to be honest his behaviour vaguely makes him look to have paedophilic tendencies, but I'm sure he's been well protected by Malcolm Brown, who has played an important part in church cover-up. The post office corruption is parallel to the life-ruining Church of England cover ups, yet it seems that church victims will only be ruined and left silenced because the Church of England are able to whitewash their own cases without interference and also allowed to silence reports such as the Jay report after using it as a publicity stunt, and there isn't a word of dissent from complicit and fearful authorities in England. Well, the Church even infiltrate the House of Lords and Royal Family, who can stand up to them without fearing for their lives?

Vennells left a horrifying trail of broken lives and death, and went on to hold a position in the Church of England without appearing to have any form of conscience about her manslaughter and destruction of these people. She remained in that position despite complaints to an uncaring Bishop by campaigners, until the matter really hit the public eye recently, and the Bishop felt the need to save his own image. And of course it came out that Justin Welby was backing Vennells as Director of Ethics or Bishop of London, horrifying but Welby being as he is, and the Church of England being what they are, she would be ideal for that position in the Church of England and in the Church of England only. The current Bishop of London is made in the image of Justin Welby, all vanity and no responsibility, all showing off how she conflicts the police and health ans social services in London and can get away with corporate manslaughter - the death of Father Griffin being the outstanding example. By their fruits you shall know them - Justin Welby, Sarah Mullally, Paula Vennells, Paul Butler, and many more. The veil is very thin, the veneer is wearing, but victims wait and suffer as the Post Office victims have, and yet Church of England victims may never see a proper public inquiry, only conflicted whitewashes sponsored by the powerful dignitaries enmeshed in the church.

Vennells is indeed a woman after Welby's heart, and they have a lot in common including knowingly causing manslaughter with no remorse, and being apparently untouchable by the law, Welby himself is protected personally by the MET police despite his criminal misconducts leading to loss of life. Welby, like Vennells appears to see no discrepancy between his destruction of lives and his position as a clergyman and in theory representative of the Lord Jesus. It is very apparent indeed to the nation that Welby is not a Servant of Jesus and doesn't know Jesus, he is a lover of Mammon and is the destruction of the Church of England and an embarrassment to all, especially when he crows and raves in the media. And each crow, each rave, rips the hearts of his victims and their loved ones. He's been told this enough times to be considered to be a sociopath when nothing stops his crowing and horrifying hypocritical PR games while he knows he's done grave wrong leading to loss of lives, and yet he just won't shut up. His fellow senior leaders, lawyers, PR firm and vicious laity are as one complicit and abetting him and no better than himself nor Vennells.

This wicked corrupt structure should be ended and the church have the choice of shutting up shop or being a church, just a church, without power, before they cause any more deaths. How to remove their enmeshment from the police, judiciary, politics and health and social care which protects them is a complex matter but needs to happen, the people of England need to access services which are not compromised by an abusive church who can dictated how people are treated and what is recorded on abuse victims' records.

The recent Jay report was a PR stunt as all church of England reports are, but the lies are wearing thin and the release of the report and the immediate open squashing of it was far far too blatant. You will recall that Jane Dodds was a safeguarding official used to help to destroy and silence victims, there's a bizarre link there with Lord Carlile who has also viciously whitewashed cases for the church, a man who shared offices with paedophiles and behaved atrociously towards women, he was MP for Monmouthshire, while Dodds repeatedly ran for Monmouthshire before abandoning them for Brecon and a political situation which gave her brief time as an MP undeserved, but anyone who has been involved in harming abuse victims should not hold a position of power. Remember how Greville Janner was allowed to die without facing his crimes? No lessons learned. Dodds and Carlile, enmeshed in the church and politics, have not been made accountable despite efforts to report them, to their party, to safeguarding, to the government, and so on. Church of England protection means untouchable, they are happy to sacrifice paedophile vicars of no importance in return for the crocodile tears PR stunts but they protect important criminals. Vennells presumably thought that being within the corrupt structure of the Church of England and a favourite of Justin Welby would protect her, but he's a sociopath, she barked up the wrong tree.

All clergy in the Church of England are trained in showmanship, public image and PR/cover-up, with the aim of pretending that these are 'good', 'wise', 'kind'  people, such as Vennells and Welby, so that no one will believe wrong of them when they do wrong. The victims won't be heard. It is wearing thin. The Church of England's own whitewashes of their misconducts are to prevent outside inquiry such as the one that has now exposed their Paula Vennells who killed a number of people before becoming an Anglican vicar, who stood up there and preached, knowing that people had committed suicide because of her actions. She is indeed after Welby's own heart, as are others who have committed serious misconduct and have been protected by him.

About a decade ago,  a clergy discipline complaint was made against the former Bishop of Winchester, Tim Dakin, the Bishop boasted of having the complaint stopped. What happened? Well, the Bishop and the Archbishop decided to throw a whitewash report by an improperly qualified person into the press, making the victim very easily identifiable. She was already street homeless as a result of the Diocese of Winchester, already destroyed beyond healing, and so they launched years on end of smears and untruths about her into the press, she was attacked for years on end, a vulnerable adult, already horrifyingly troubled by a terrible upbringing which led her into the hands of two church serial abusers who were being actively protected by church, freemasons, police, judiciary and politicians who they had links to. This story is a massive one, but from start to finish, the only aim was to publicly discredit the victim, her account was never included in any report and she was painted as insane, violent and a troublemaker, despite having done thousands of hours of voluntary work for the church, especially for the vicar whose freemason-magistrate-influencer of the police husband abused her, as she was used as a dogsbody for them when she was extremely vulnerable. The very circumstances of finding herself in their hands was serious misconduct by this couple and yet the victim was attacked and blamed openly for it, and still no real investigation has been carried out. 

The victim was never violent, was so vulnerable from autism and a horrific background which left her unable to look after herself, and the failed UK services certainly did not, and it was inevitable that drawn into the church by someone breaching professional boundaries, she became the victim of the abusers who the church harbours and benefits financially from. She wasn't the one who spoke up, she was forced to, by someone from an autism service, and she was instantly and utterly destroyed, by the church and their enmeshed police and judiciary, the chief magistrate who oversaw her getting a criminal record for standing up to the church was the wife of a clergyman who had been involved. As an autistic person who had attained 27 years without a criminal record and with thousands of hours volunteering behind her, both for church and community, as well as a career carved out despite communication difficulties, she never came to terms with the criminal record nor the incessant police violence against her which started when they shook hands with her abuser, who was already a known serial abuser protected by the church and thus never convicted, the second of two. The victim's story still awaits telling from beyond the grave that the church and police have energetically buried her in! 

The church left the victim on the streets, only they didn't, they continued to send police after her for beatings and detentions, they continued to interfere in her use of any homeless or support services, until she was left with her life beyond repair, the intention by the church could only have been her death, but it took them a decade, it took Justin Welby, Tim Dakin and unqualified, conflicted and dishonest reports in the press, identifying the victim and removing the whole new life she built despite feeling that her life was worthless as a result of the police beatings and their abuse of her and their insistence she was mad and the church had  done no wrong, stated to her very blatantly. They tried to have her put away over and over for the church, while leaving her seriously injured from beatings. I can feel her pain, and I can feel the pain of the Post Office victims who were destroyed in an all too similar way. Imagine living knowing that you are you, but being told on record and in public that you are someone else, it breaks a heart beyond healing. 

Dakin and Welby caused a huge civil war in the church, neither have ever been disciplined. Dakin has never been arrested for breaching an injunction which the woman brought against him to preserve her own life as she was threatened with numerous hateful whitewashes by conflicted people including a judge, a bishop, a senior police officer and his linked safeguarding partnership. This is why the church of England are dangerous, they are the Post Office but with unlimited abuse of power which is challenged by nobody. So there was an injunction, which the Bishop had his lawyers lie to a court about and then breached, and there was the clergy discipline measure, and this is what happened. The matter went to the clerk, the matter was batted about, and then the clerk told the victim the matter was being referred directly to Justin Welby, who had openly been in the thick of discrediting and destroying the victim. The victim appealed, and in vain, Welby protected Dakin and they had the victim violently beaten by police again, another attempt to make her out to be insane and have her put away. They killed her. Not only that, throughout the years, a former police officer, Bob Hill, tried to stop the harm to her, and in the end as a result of the stress, succumbed to a major bleed on the brain, he was misled massively by the church, which did not help him to help the victim, he had no idea, as former congregant. that the church were so abusive and corrupt. ]

Because there's no 'Public Interest' and the Lords, Government, Police, Judiciary, Health and Social Services, charities and so much more are enmeshed and conflicted, the matter will never see the light in the spectacular way that Paula Vennells' evil has now seen the light. There are many very high profile people who have abused their positions in this matter as well as police and other authorities, and no one polices the police, complaints were made constantly to the regional and national policing authorities, to the Lords Speaker, to the House of Commons, Social Services, Charity Commission, and so on, all are enmeshed. The victims of the Post Office and Infected Blood Scandal met similar denial and blame, what a terrible country the UK is, but if only the Church of England was separated from their sources of protection and made accountable as Vennells and the Health Service are being, it won't bring victims back to life but would make the UK a fairer and more just place. 

Jane Dodds, who I mentioned, was part of the massive abuse cover up, along with Graham Tilby and Moira Murray, they've broken the law with impunity and acted in a sociopathic way, followed by a succession of safeguarding officials, not to mention Jane Fisher and Jackie Rowlands , who repeatedly gave the order for the police to 'have the victim put down or put away' leaving her disabled with serious injuries. What has the church, policing themselves, done to ensure these safeguarding heads have no access to children and vulnerable people ever again? Judging by Dodds crowing at getting elected despite complaints to her local safeguarding board, not a lot. The current leader of the church 'National Safeguarding Team' attacked victims openly and made it clear that what they do is not safeguarding. But who is the Paula Vennells of the Church of England? His name is William Nye, he incredibly pretends to be a learned Christian, while he's sent victims, including Welby and Dakin's victim, to their graves.

The Church of England also have an undetectable way of destroying victims and silencing them, including Dakin and Welby's victim. They have a group of clergy and victims known as the Stockholm Syndrome victims, Flying Monkeys or Groupies, some of whom are abusers themselves, but protected by the church, this group, mainly male apart from Janet Fife and at least one other female, stand between victims and the church, attack and harm other victims, and are rented to influence any inquiry or investigation while other victims are excluded at their expense. Until  they face the disciplinary action they deserve, Revds Martin Sewell and Stephen Parsons and Phil Johnson steer this group, other members include but are not limited to Chris Hernadez, who is a danger to the vulnerable and proven so, but holds a church position unmonitored, Matt Ineson, much the same, Andy Morse, Mark Stibbe - directly involved in the Welby Dakin abuse case on behalf of the abusers and their supporters, these men are directly tied in to a fake unregistered charity called Macsas, whose attacks on the unprotected victims has been astounding while they double-face in the same way as Welby and Vennells and pretend to be a charity for abuse victims, they draw the victims in and enable the church in destroying them, their attack on the Welby Dakin victim was undiluted violence but because there is no safeguarding in the Church, only Vennells-Style denial and cover-up, and the Charity Commission cannot deal with unregistered charities and the fake charity is run by a lawyer and supported by other lawyers, nothing is done. 

There are many silent victims. I will never ever minimize what has happened to the Post Office victims, I cry when I think of it, the same with the victims of the Infected Blood Scandal, and I applaud them for not giving up their fight for justice, the same as the Stardust and Hillsborough survivors. But victims of the Church of England will never see justice unless things change. The groupies and their Macsas will continue a charade that will be in the way of the real picture being seen, and they will continue to hurt other victims without being halted. 

It looks as if although it is clear that Vennells is guilty, she will not be imprisoned or made accountable, she won't be stripped of her assets, and she's led a life of comfort while those who worked so hard and were innocent, will always suffer the consequences, those who lived, because although being cleared was a great victory, it won't make the suffering or the deaths go away. In the Church of England, the men who caused the death of a vulnerable adult and a retired police officer will continue their lavish lives, while someone who was never in trouble before the church, who, psychologically damaged, was driven mad by being regressed to childhood and abused, was beaten and detained constantly from when the abuse was reported, while her abusers laughed, will never see justice, over and over again her friends, work, accommodation, volunteering and whole life were ripped from her when she built them on a shaky foundation but always clean and legal and hardworking, never committed a crime despite huge emotional and psychological damage which the church and police tried to record as madness, until the church showed that they are no longer remotely Christiand but vengeful, hateful, because she wouldn't stop speaking up about serial abusers. Not a single person held accountable, and the full scope of her experiences were not investigated, the reports were a lie that made her appear to be a monster, and included no account from her and nothing but what the church and enmeshed authoritiesd selected to distort reality and yet the wicked men who broke the law, abused position and destroyed her are living a Paula Vennells life with the police guilty of misconduct ensuring that the matter is 'closed because the victim is a criminal'. 

When will the Church of England be held accountable the same as any other public body? And the Police? When will we have authorities who can arrest church leaders? When will Paula Vennells be arrested? And Justin Welby? 

Regards, 

John Carter. 

Guest Post - Jay

Dear recipients,

If you receive this email it is indeed addressed to you. It's a long article/letter which John has also offered to publish.

My name is Jaycey Lescar, and I'm from Antrim. I am associated in a way with John and Jan, who are activists, John's health means I've been reading through his notes and contacting people with the concerns which are squashed, hidden and silenced by the powers in the UK and the complicit press. The New Year is something to celebrate in that respect, because while the BBC are still desperately whining about Ghislaine Maxwell being a 'favourite daughter' (to whom?) in the BBC's unashamed support of abuse and corruption among the highest tiers of the UK, Ghislaine Maxwell is finally serving life in prison after decades of her victims suffering injustice and slurs.

I happened to be reading about the Jersey bloggers and the recent safeguarding report when the news of Gary Burgess's death arrived in John's inbox. Uncharitable as it may be, my response and John and Jan's was 'Good, at least one of those involved in the Jersey atrocities will face divine justice even though he never faced the deserved disciplinary action when complaints were levelled against him'.

What was harder to puzzle out, was 'Does the devil reward wickedness such as Burgess's or does Burgess go into the lake of fire like everyone else?

The word 'Renowned' is being used for Burgess, what is he renowned for, abuse of a vulnerable adult contributing to their death? Or spending his final years attention-seeking persistently in the press with his 'illness', with no remorse for the serious harm and anguish he caused? The only thing that is certain now is that while ITV protected him from the consequences of his serious misconduct and abuse of position to distribute lies and defamation against an abuse victim for the defendants, he will face divine justice now. ITV still need to carry out an investigation and indeed so do the instigators of the smear campaign, and even a Jimmy Savile posthumous 'do it when he's dead' investigation is better than nothing. The complaint still stands. The complaint still stands regarding everyone involved and everyone who failed to act. It hasn't gone away because Burgess and his colleagues helped to kill a vulnerable adult to silence powerful men who had done wrong.

I'm aware that across the board, the media got complaints recently about Justin Welby abusing his position and the media to advertise himself and his agenda and cause distress to the general public, something he's done for the whole of his career and something that the media have received complaints against for the same length of time. Justin Welby's behaviour has always been bizarre and unbelievable, and it appears to not just be apathy but the same system that protected Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the same network of people, which has kept Welby in his position and behaving as bizarrely and callously as he has. He, the same as Gary Burgess, hasn't been held to account for destroying the vulnerable adult in the Jersey and Winchester case.

It is even said that Justin Welby's recent desperate display was because he was afraid of being mentioned in the Maxwell case, although how attacking the British public helps to protect him is unclear, apparently his overlords on the World Economic Forum required it of him. Justin Welby's displays rarely or never relate to Christianity, religious life or the Church of England which is collapsing under him, except, for example when powerful people and abuse are in the public spotlight in relation to the Anglican church, and then he steps in with scripts from the freemason PR firm and profusions of fake apologies, cover-up and press relations games, as was the case in the Jersey and Winchester case, except that Welby himself enabled that horror and the wickedness of Burgess and others in their attacks on the victim and lies about the case, and Welby played a constant active part in the case because of the high profile figures involved. Is Burgess really renowned for his part in cover-up of high profile wrongdoing? Will that be his epitaph?

Last year the Bishop of Winchester was finally disgraced, and the appointments manager who had allowed him to be appointed was sacked. This wasn't done because the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury were finally held to account for publicly destroying a vulnerable adult, indeed the notes on the Bishop's disgrace included his boasting about the Archbishop getting him let off the clergy discipline measure over the Jersey and Winchester matter. The victim, who the church had expected to kill through public disgrace very quickly, went on fighting and took the Bishop to the Clergy Discipline Panel, where Sir Hedley, another in the Maxwell-Epstein Wagon Train, for want of a better expression, threatened her and tried to force the complaint closed, while the bewildered clerk scratched his head and said 'It's okay, I'll refer it to the Archbishop'. Both Welby and Sentamu, both known by many victims for supporting abusers and forcing victims into silence, worked hard to protect the Bishop of Winchester. This is the clergy discipline measure he boasted of wriggling out of. The other notes from the disgrace of the Bishop were the half a million in non-disclosure orders on the Winchester case, given to the former Dean of Jersey and others when the  was removed under excuses and lies that Burgess and friends published with glee, the Dean was in fact forcibly removed, not for wrongdoing but for the negative public impact on the church. The Archbishop claimed to know nothing about the NDA's but was personally involved and proven to be in knowledge of the church NDA's but the press published his lies without investigation.

But the point is, and I'm being very verbal, like HG and J&J, because there's a lot to say here and always has been too much unsaid on this case while only untruth has been published. Every clergy person in the diocese of Winchester, the Deaneries, the Cathedral and Chapter, were made aware by HG of what she was suffering at the hands of the Bishop of Winchester, and the standard 'Ignore her, she's insane' email was sent round by safeguarding and the Bishop's staff. All high profile victims of the Church of England are aware of being defamed this way when they speak up as justice is refused, but ever single clergyperson and member of staff played along to this, showing how very dangerous and corrupt the Church of England is, and yet when clergy and staff were sacked, then they themselves were outraged and worked to oust the Bishop for themselves, these non-vulnerable, salaried and housed adult clergy and staff who would go on to other homes and jobs if dismissed, but they showed horrifying and abusive contempt for a victim who had nothing and who was being killed by the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury through press defamation and resulting hatred from the general public as she lost her home, her work, her friends, her studies, her volunteering, her whole life.

The poor little clergy and staff who took part in harming the victim were offended when they suffered the same maltreatment even though they weren't defamed in the media for years and were basically able to continue their lives. Gary Burgess wasn't used to attack them with falsehoods.

So what happened in Jersey? Jersey is the home of the powerful gatekeepers to the offshore finance industry, the wagon train of Epstein and Maxwell, the Lords and MPs of the UK, and of course Justin Welby's employers in the World Economic Forum, who most of his unchristian press displays and attempts to influence people are for. It seems that someone miscalculated in getting the Archbishop and the Bishop of Winchester to use the Jersey case as a fake safeguarding showcase as part of the obligatory safeguarding lie that has spanned Welby's career to protect the Church of England from being regulated. The safeguarding lie is a simple equation: Lie to the unquestioning press constantly about how great safeguarding is, how things have changed, and how the church is very very sorry and the victims are very brave, while simultaneously continuing to destroy victims and make them out to be insane when they speak up and search everywhere for justice while the Church of England conflict all sources of justice right up to the Royal family (Maxwell-Epstein Wagon Train), police, judges, Lords, MPs, NHS, Social Services, Charity Commission, charities, even the church abuse charities are run by the Church of England and their violence towards victims, especially the Jersey victim, is legendary.

So, HG, the Jersey and Winchester victim, reported her second abuser in the Diocese of Winchester, when he made it clear he would abuse again and had no care for her collapsed mental state after a year of his sexual and emotional abuse, he even boasted about other abuses. HG was pushed to report when other people spoke to social services and the police, after the church in Jersey had literally looked on while she was abused, when the abuser was supposed to be under supervision because of previous offences.

HG had acquired brain injury, misdiagnosed as Asperger Syndrome as part of many many NHS failures. The NHS never recorded HG's background, told in her book 'Stepping out of the Circle' in brief form, and failed her all her adult life. HG as well as being very determined to gain a better quality of life, was also childlike and obsessed with 'God' from the cult she grew up in, which is how the Church of England got their claws into her and subjected her to years of harm, she was also obsessed with gaining the education which she'd missed out on, and finding the 'family' that she felt she should have had and that she was sure that 'God would send', when the man in Jersey told her that God had sent her to him as a daughter, and it went from there.

The report by the Diocese of Winchester claims all sorts of lies but reality was, HG deliberately and of her own volition escaped the abuser to go and live in a bedsit but he would ask to see her at his work place and at his home, continuing to emotionally abuse her severely as he had all along, and when alone, he groped her as well. She was in a confused state, made worse by the doctor (unfortunately a church member as several Jersey Doctors influencing the case were) giving her xanax as the abuser had made her very sick. These things aren't mentioned in any reports nor the attacks on the victim by Burgess and his colleagues.

Things went downhill fast for HG when the police had a 'gentleman's/freemason's' chat with the abuser and his associates, the abuser's brother being one of the most powerful men in the island. The police released the abuser and immediately violently brutalized HG, and she never recovered but spiralled downhill into despair, which came out as fury at the injustice, as the church shunned her and the story was told from the abuser's side openly throughout the church. HG had to leave the island temporarily as a result and went to Maytree suicide prevention centre, in the meantime her friends in the mainland Winchester Diocese were all influenced by slander of her by the safeguarding office of the Winchester Diocese, all devout churchgoers, they believed every word and shunned HG, she was left with no one and in a terrible state with the Bishop and his wife of the time deliberately adding to that, none of which is in any report. The police at all times aided the church in harming HG and added to it, until she was utterly destroyed and left on the streets, still being defamed by the Diocese who were embarrassed by the fact that she was on the streets of Winchester because of them. They continued to try to use the police against her and used their patronage of the homeless services to drive her out, she slept rough for years until Justin Welby and Tim Dakin, with no thought for her wellbeing whatsoever, published a lying report about her, the report by Jan Korris, was a breach of Jan Korris's role as a counsellor, HG was not her client, and she harmed HG and used her title as a counsellor to do so, which should have led to instant dismissal by the BACP, but she was a church member and protected by the Church of England.

The report was published internationally for no apparent reason other than the false safeguarding programme that the Church of England have had to play out, and yet it was the opposite of safeguarding to traduce a vulnerable adult with false reports and have her attacked internationally by ignorant strangers as well as the network of abusers' families and church members in Jersey and outside. And of course ignorant journalists such as Burgess. The governance of Jersey is hopelessly corrupt and linked to money, power and the high profile abusers such as Savile, Epstein and Maxwell, and also, just as in the UK church, the dignitaries are church members and supporters, so flinging the case into the news caused the powerful in the UK and Jersey to 'take measures' to protect the abusive church and the high profile people involved in the abuse and cover-up. They did as they do, using the press and media to the full to traduce and attack the victim, helped limitlessly by the lies and distortions published by Korris. Also by the fact that the main newspaper in Jersey, the Jersey Evening Post is overseen by the powerful brother of the abuser, mentioned earlier and they published utter hatred and lies against the victim by members of the church.

The church showed how unchristian and ignorant of abuse and vulnerability they were as they and the dignitaries and the media kept up a hateful onslaught for years on end. This kind of smear campaign kills stronger people, celebrities even, and this was a vulnerable adult with no foundation, who was attacked constantly by strangers as a result of media hatred. driven from accommodation and work and left in despair, it never stopped, even in the past few years, there have been articles such as Lord Faulks congratulating the smug Justin Welby over his deliberate interference in the case, and Justin Welby was open, with the Bishop of Winchester, in 'clearing' the wrongdoers before further openly conflicted whitewash investigations had been carried out by in-house church members, Bishops and judges.

Burgess, Gripton, Price and others from the press were at all times clear in their aim to keep publishing lies for the Church and ignoring the victim's side of things, they were vicious and untruthful to extremes. Price had interfered in the case while the victim was in Jersey, publishing lies about the case and threatening the victim, it was made very clear that the media dance to the tune of the Church of England communications teams and would ignore anything said by the victim, so she ran a blog, which was hampered by her severe trauma and mental state from years of the abuse and harm by the Church of England, and which was also ridiculed by the sham charity Macsas, a non-registered charity run by and in a symbiotic relationship with, the Church of England, money in return for cover-ups. The behaviour of macsas dating back to the original abuse in this case has been shocking and dangerous and has at all times been to traduce the victim and silence her, and they do this to other victims.

On top of all this, a group of bloggers in Jersey and connected to Jersey, decided to use the case as ammunition against the Jersey government in what they perceived to be wrong with the government, while several other bloggers used the case to attack the victim.

Reverends Peter Ould and Gavin Ashenden, who use blogging as a kind of outlet for their sexual perversions and misogynistic tendencies, attacked the victim alongside the mainstream media, relentlessly and full of untruth, not least because the only source of information used was the Church of England's own false reports and lying press releases but of course because they wanted someone to attack and scapegoat. Incredibly they have been allowed to go on to pretend to be advocating for abuse victims in the Church of England!!! Although it isn't that surprising as safeguarding in the Church of England is a total sham and so predators like these men, having done as they have done, not just blogging but also doing lying interviews about HG in the Jersey Media, are allowed to access victims in the Church of England.

Ashenden was made to step down from his positions in Jersey and the Queen's chaplaincy, a volunteer role nothing to do with the Queen, because he used that title to embarrass the Queen every time he abused the press to attack a vulnerable person or group. He's spent his time church hopping but seems to have sadly found a home for his malice in the Catholic church, with the press and media still entertaining his hatred and prejudice and calling him 'The Queen's Former Chaplain'.

The other Jersey bloggers are as follows, Rico Sorda, Neil McMurray, Stuart Syvret, Tony Bellews, Bob Hill. There is a further blogger involved, a mentally ill troll called Paul O'Dwyer, who uses the pen name 'Polo' and has worked hard to destroy the victim alongside Ould, Ashenden, Burgess and the rest.

Stuart Syvret is famous for the efforts the Jersey Government went to to silence him over abuse in Jersey, he focuses not just on the centre of power in Jersey and the significance of that power and corruption in relation to the finance industries but the outward-radiating waggon-trains of Epstein-Maxwell and the rest of the powerful figures all linked through the finance industry and child abuse and thus Jersey, the epicentre, Stuart writes about this because Burgess and colleagues don't. Stuart is outstanding, but the Jersey media made him out to be insane on behalf of the powers, to make people disbelieve him, see a pattern? They did the same with Stuart as with HG.

When the Diocese of Winchester continued to destroy the victim publicly, she took the Bishop of Winchester to court. The Bishop was put under an order by the court that the victim had to be included in the reports about her case, something that the Church of England had somehow 'forgotten' to do, all reports excluded the victim thus far. The Bishop hid this by lying to the press while he breached the injunction by not including the victim but instead of explaining he couldn't release the whitewash reports that excluded the victim, he lied to the press and traduced the victim by claiming that 'the reports weren't being released for the sake of her wellbeing' thus continuing to build up press-led belief that the victim was a monster and that the church and powerful people involved were right and innocent.

It was Stuart Syvret who prevented the victim from committing suicide at this point , Stuart, the renowned Jersey Blogger, a better journalist than Burgess, while blogger 'Paul O'Dwyer'/Polo, furthered attacks and traducing of the victim. O'Dwyer's hateful and immoral behaviour in the case beggars belief and on the subject of Burgess dying unrepentant and unpunished, it is a pity that the obituary for Paul O'Dwyer in the press recently was for a different man, but I will return to O'Dwyer and his dangerous behaviour later.

The other bloggers, Rico Sorda and Neil McMurray are bloggers who think well of themselves and see themselves as a kind of 'resistance' against the Jersey government , and used the HG case as a kind of badly aimed 'ammunition'. At no point did they converse with HG to check the accuracy of their blogs about her case and instead left her deeply anguished by publishing lies spread by the Church of England. The horrible psychological twist being that they considered themselves to be 'on HG's side' and the knights in armour, even though they refused to communicate with her, and their aim was generally to further their own cause.

HG contacted them in anguish as she did all media, asking them to stop hurting and shocking her as they, the knights in armour, were hurting her. They didn't take any notice of her but continued to use her case, and astonishingly, despite allowing Paul O'Dwyer to attack her, as he is very close to them and their blogs and spends his long hours on the dole commenting on their blogs, even recently they were seen commenting about the case as if they were on the murdered victim's side despite their part in her destruction. They used her, and it scarred her for the remainder of her life. They never interviewed her, just as Burgess and the rest of the media didn't.

Tony Bellews was a very interesting case, he was terrified that his church, one of the churches who did significant harm to the victim but which he still wholeheartedly supported, would find out that he supported the victim emotionally, he was known as a 'fence sitter' by many in Jersey and he appeared to be dangerously on the fence in this case, afraid of being slandered and shunned himself while at the same time highlighting some of the deep wrongs of the Jersey and Winchester case and the behaviour of people such as Ashenden, although he followed Peter Ould and other abusive priests and laity on social media as well as 'Thinking Anglicans' a site for bored trolls, who attacked the victim violently, Tony turned a blind eye to their attacks on the victim. Tony was the only one to warn the victim when he was blogging about her case, to avoid causing her the shock and trauma that each new article of any kind, mainstream or blog, caused her. Eventually as the church continued to attack her and she couldn't cope, he turned his back on her in favour of the church. It is a shame because Tony's support of the victim and the time and resources he invested in making life less hellish for her was outstanding, it's a shame that while men like Tony tried to help HG, in fear for his own wellbeing, prats like Burgess just led attacks on her and did nothing to record her side of things.

Bob Hill was the main Jersey Blogger involved and sadly he too printed the Church's misinformation over and over, while appointing himself as advocate for the victim, he caused her trauma in huge measure as he claimed to be on her side while reproducing the Church of England's lying reports and the lies of the Church-Government members in Jersey. In Jersey church and government are enmeshed and conflicted as they are in England, but in Jersey government and law are also enmeshed, so the judiciary in Jersey are in government and also Church dignitaries, and this is open, as is the destruction of the victim through these conflictions. Bob tried to untangle the web of confliction but despite HG's accounts of things he refused to accept that the Church of England posed a severe risk to her, or that evidence and statements could be tampered with and distorted, he fought for the victim to have a voice in the investigations and failed, he managed to do tremendous harm to the victim by repeating the Church of England's lies about why they excluded her from her own case and he naively enabled the Church of England to trace and access the victim, when she had explained to him in great detail that she was a fugitive from them for her own safety. This unfortunately led to the breakdown of their relations which the Church hoped for, as they had presumably expected to kill the victim with the first year of press onslaught and hadn't counted on anyone supporting the victim.

Bob continued to try to take things into his own hands, refusing to meet with the victim when he was in the area where she lived, publishing his blogs without warning her, and continuing to publish inaccuracies, but seemingly meaning well, in the same way harming her as McMurray and Sorda did. He decided to file a court case against the Church attack on the victim, without her consent and at the same time as she filed against the Bishop of Winchester, she stopped his court case and was attacked viciously by the Jersey bloggers and their 'fan club' who had no idea of the realities because no one among them knew or asked HG's side and simply decided she'd 'hurt poor Bob' when reality is he hurt her, scarred her for the rest of her days. Paul O'Dwyer, the blogger hanger on, was one of the worst in this case, and I will talk about him before I conclude with Burgess.

Paul O'Dwyer/Polo lives in Dublin, it appears that he's a long term benefits dependent and there is no doubt whatsoever from his behaviour that he's mentally ill. He writes blogs but also hangs on to the Jersey blogs and comments on each post with his opinion, he is obsessed with Jersey, but he has other obsessions, it seems, pornography, Nazis and preying. His behaviour caused deep distress to HG in her vulnerable state.

During the first years of HG being publicly destroyed by the Church of England and the media, 'Polo' as he calls himself on twitter, blogs etc, decided he would be involved in the HG case, alongside other unstable hangers on, another being a woman called 'Julie', who was used by the Church of England to drive a wedge between Bob Hill and HG and trace HG in her hiding for the Church. There were other unstable and dangerous hangers on, who damaged HG in her bewildered state as she had no idea of the agenda or mentality of these people and was desperate in seeking comfort and support as she was blindsided by the violent public attacks on her. She unwittingly enabled Polo, Julie and others, by interacting with them, laughing at and reposting some of Polo's less vile creations and trustingly allowing these unstable people to manipulate her.

'Polo' decided to constantly send her pictures of people involved in her case, which alarmed and bemused her, she was traumatized enough by the whole situation, she didn't want to be reminded of these people and the fact that every single one had escaped justice. But the pictures became increasingly freaky, Polo had an obsession with photoshop and sexuality and nudity and kept sending and publishing nude and sexual caricatures and cartoons, including one of the abuser and one of the powerful Jersey dignitaries who supported him, a number of the Bishop of Winchester naked, which Polo threatened to attribute to HG, And on twitter he sent her photos of the Dean whose full misconduct was never investigated, she begged him to stop and he blocked her. Interesting, an insight into his unstable mentality. Later on he published a lying article supporting the Bishop of Winchester's dishonesty, and refused to remove it when asked by HG, and he also published a page of photos of Jersey dignitaries in Nazi uniforms, this was picked up by the press with horror and complaints were made, but because Polo lived in Dublin, not Jersey, it wasn't easy to bring him to justice.  Obviously, knowing the occupation of Jersey by the Nazi forces, Polo's attack through depicting Jersey people as Nazi's was an act of uncontrolled violence and part of his bizarre obsession with Jersey that can only stem from mental illness. Another obsession he has is sending daily obscure tweets to the Pope's twitter account, it should be funny but this is what more dangerous behaviour is born of. He is what is known on social media as an 'incel'.  His behaviour, although hateful, is carried out in the manner of an irresponsible child who has no idea quite how far he's crossed the boundaries.

After that, police and safeguarding complaints were made about Polo in Ireland because he published a lying attack on HG. He self-pityingly claimed to have 'mistakenly tried to befriend her'. and cried and whimpered about how she mistreated him - mistreated him? He took part in an onslaught against a vulnerable adult and got a reaction. He never befriended HG, he never met her, he ignored or took offense at her requests for him to stop certain behaviours, he took part in falsehoods and sent her pornographic and other offensive pictures and she asked him to stop. Anyway, his article, claiming she had written to him, which wouldn't be the case, gave what he thought was her name, thankfully also not true, but he deliberatedly named her when the press-led hatred of years of her would lead to that putting her life in danger.

Not only that but obviously his hateful defamation of her could be picked up by any potential employer or landlord or anyone associated with her and cause her loss and shame. If it had been her name that he published. He left that up after HG was sent to her grave by the Church of England, Defamation even in death, several years gone now. He was reported multiple times to police and safeguarding and he is known to both, and known to be unstable and a troll who is bored and thus destructive but Dublin is currently a city overwhelmed with problems and he isn't considered the worst, but think about this, it was official journalists such as Gary Burgess who enabled these people to target a vulnerable adult. Burgess who acted for the Church of England's communications department by spreading lies unquestioningly and not interviewing the victim, because the press and media were 'forbidden' by the Church of England to do so and that is the corrupt power of the Church of England.

The further stage of the Leveson inquiry was deliberately stopped, by power, so that the press could go on being used to abuse power and there is no reliable or proper form of regulation either for the UK media and press or the BBC, both run a false, skim-the-surface game of complaint management, as was discovered by HG as the press openly attacked her and enabled her records to be traced and her to be identified and raped, beaten up, hounded etc. The BBC take bad reporting to higher levels all the time, and a lot of it is again about power and who's being reported on. Justin Welby, as guilty as the Bishop of Winchester but powerfully connected, goes on vomiting his worthless and irrelevant agenda into the press even though he has caused the death of a vulnerable adult, his press displays are not to do with his church, they're to do with what his sponsors demand of him, and he himself has many stains on his hands, much more than one death, more than two. But because of the blind and vile media who go on reporting the way that they do, as demanded by the powers, Welby remains and angers the nation incessantly. He recently, maybe for the first time, actually felt the anger of the nation, the feedback that he hides behind staff from in his palace, because his judgement and unchristian behaviour finally went too far in the week before Christmas. He made hokey and Trump-like embarrassed excuses in the vile Church Times, whose part in destroying the Jersey victim was astounding.

Gary Burgess, an outstanding prat and attention-seeking remorseless whiner is dead. One wicked person down, many many more from the unreprentant Jersey atrocity to go. If no justice on earth, I pray that God speeds up all of their journeys to the lake of fire.

HG herself went on crying for justice and suffered the fate that most high profile victims who won't be silent do, if the slander doesn't silence them, and making them out to be insane doesn't work, the Church of England circulars 'He/she's mad, ignore them', then the church moved on to the conflicted police and had HG seriously injured again. The level of serious physical and mental injury that her decades of suffering at the hands of the Church of England caused was on a par to that of a combat veteran. The Church of England made sure HG was again left permanently homeless and without any hope at all of returning to work, despite her years of efforts while the Church of England and Gary and co destroyed her.

The Dean of Oxford, Martyn Percy described his ordeal at the hands of the Church of England as like the 'holocaust' and he had inappropriately touched someone to earn being violently pubicly destroyed, HG had not, all she had done was react to being severely abused by protected known abusers in the Church of England, Percy had his family, his home, an income and stability behind his fight and although he was called 'mad' by the rag Telegraph so was HG and HG had nothing, the Church's violence even separated her from her abusive family. She went back to the Channel Islands as an HG style joke, to say her goodbye, and she looked into the eyes of some of her oppressors but such was the damage that no one recognised her in 2019, and there the story ended. The press are hitmen for those in power in the UK, Gary Burgess towed the line and should have no honour in his death whatsoever, he's outstanding for helping with a murder, nothing else. And here we are, like Ghislaine Maxwell's victims, showing that a press murder cannot bring the silence that those in power hoped for, that the Church of England and Jersey hoped for, there are very very serious crimes and misconducts waiting to be be brought to light, not by a conflicted church-picked ex-policewoman whitewashing the  already damaged evidence for the dignitaries in Salisbury, Winchester, Lambeth Palace and Jersey, but by the first genuine independent review into the whole matter including the incessant lies by the media. Burgess will undoubtedly be happy to miss that in hell.

Jaycey Lescar.

Church of England (Diocese of Oxford) and Social Media

 Oxford Diocese and Social Media.

I'm watching the current situation regarding social media with bemusement. 

I understand that the Church of England and Anglican Church, for Example the Diocese of St. Davids in Wales, keep falling foul of social media, by bad posting or by the fact that silenced victims are using social media to speak up, and there are armies of silenced and wronged victims left hurting, so what better way for victims and their advocates to speak up than in a community such as social media? If the Diocese of Oxford don't like the truth staring them in the face on social media, what better way to show Christianity than to gracefully step back rather than make a spectacle of themselves by blocking their own clergy or posting catty backhanded posts supposedly including Christian references? The poor old C of E never really made it into this century, possibly not the last either.

Let us never forget the weasel words 'Rascally Voices' used as an attempt to defend the indefensible in the C of E, and use this as a guide to how the C of E respond to criticism. I get this feeling that the C of E are becoming anxious about the increasing voice against their misconducts and are extending their hypocritical self-rightous undermining of those they hurt, to social media, while, as they do to letters, phonecalls emails and correspondence from their victims and the advocates, they are trying to block them on social media and undermine and traduce them while misusing the Bible to appear righteous. The C of E's clunky use of social media was already a pain, with Justin Welby's curated account trotting out political interference and hypocrisy and pretences of compassion which harm the C of E's victims, and the C of E's own twitter appearing to have a number of authors offering the usual bland, Maxist or hypoctical views of the outdated and failing church. The Anglican Bishop of St. Davids showed just how severely the Anglican Church can abuse social media, with a curated account sending out hundreds of nasty tweets and replies per day.

This is what I, as an observer, know about the Diocese of Oxford:

• The Bishop has been accused of serious misconduct in relation to a rape case and his failure to act appropriately, no action has been taken.
• An extreme amount of money, akin to that used by Archbishop Welby and Bishop Dakin to cover up in the Jersey and Winchester case and hide their misconduct, has been used by the Diocese of Oxford to publicly destroy the Dean of Christ Church Cathedral Oxford, a kind of mirror case in a way, rather than real grievances and safeguarding issues being resolved in private and properly as a Christian church should have. As a result, the Dean and his family have been put at risk of harm.
• The Bishop and Diocese of Oxford blocked an abuse victim's email after being contacted by them.
• A conflicted QC with a position in the Oxford Diocese took part in whitewashing the Winchester and Jersey case. 
• The Diocese of Oxford have made headlines by blocking their own Canon, and have added to that by sending out self-righteous and judgemental tweets.
• I understand that there is a lot more and worse than what I write, from what others are telling me. I think it's time for a visitation, but 'Pet' Dioceses such as Winchester and Oxford, where the money is, don't tend to get visitations.

The Diocese of Oxford need to focus inwards and look at their own safeguarding, Christianity and humanity issues rather than typical C of E judgements over others. The Diocese of Oxford is one of what I call 'The Problem Dioceses'. Oxford, Winchester, Sheffield, etc, I'm sure everyone gets that, ordination of senior clergy is on a favour and handshake basis and doesn't lead to a healthy diocese, if such a thing exists, it leads to clergy on the ground suffering, safeguarding issues, a toxic environment, an expensive load of NDA's, resignations, fights spilling over into the public domain, terrible excuses being made for the problems being made a public issue, etc etc.

I don't know the Canon who was blocked, but she has the same surname as the psychopathic safeguarding lead who helped to kill the Winchester and Jersey victim and harm and anguish many others, and I know she's part of the toxic church times, but nonetheless, it reflects badly on the Oxford Diocese for being petty, if they don't like their own Canon, rather than make a spectacle of themselves, they could mute her and/or speak to her in person, maybe before taking any action to break communication with her on social media, just as the Bishop of St. Davids should have aired her concerns about the government in person or via an exchange of letters, and just as the Oxford Christ Church, Winchester and Sheffield matters could have been dealt with in private. If the Church of England don't like public shaming on social media, they need to stop and think about their own use of the media, they are in no position to judge anyone, the Archbishop's media tirades are offensive and hypocritical but action against him is never taken despite relentless complaints and thousands upon thousands of comments by the general public condeming him, he, like the C of E in general, ignore and block feedback and criticism. 

The C of E crusade against social media warriors will reflect badly on them, and will backfire, it isn't God's Work to be hypocritical as they are being, and they need to focus on their own physical and spiritual mess rather than trying unsuccessfully to remove the small  and only voice of the silenced thousands. 

Just a footnote, apologies for those who missed this, the Canon from Christ Church Oxford, who also wurbles in the toxic Church Times, probably caused some upset by wurbling about Oxford and Winchester or other things the C of E don't want anyone wurbling about. You know how the plump old Anglicans wurble, the C of E is fussy about what they wurble about.