Guest Post - Jay

Dear recipients,

If you receive this email it is indeed addressed to you. It's a long article/letter which John has also offered to publish.

My name is Jaycey Lescar, and I'm from Antrim. I am associated in a way with John and Jan, who are activists, John's health means I've been reading through his notes and contacting people with the concerns which are squashed, hidden and silenced by the powers in the UK and the complicit press. The New Year is something to celebrate in that respect, because while the BBC are still desperately whining about Ghislaine Maxwell being a 'favourite daughter' (to whom?) in the BBC's unashamed support of abuse and corruption among the highest tiers of the UK, Ghislaine Maxwell is finally serving life in prison after decades of her victims suffering injustice and slurs.

I happened to be reading about the Jersey bloggers and the recent safeguarding report when the news of Gary Burgess's death arrived in John's inbox. Uncharitable as it may be, my response and John and Jan's was 'Good, at least one of those involved in the Jersey atrocities will face divine justice even though he never faced the deserved disciplinary action when complaints were levelled against him'.

What was harder to puzzle out, was 'Does the devil reward wickedness such as Burgess's or does Burgess go into the lake of fire like everyone else?

The word 'Renowned' is being used for Burgess, what is he renowned for, abuse of a vulnerable adult contributing to their death? Or spending his final years attention-seeking persistently in the press with his 'illness', with no remorse for the serious harm and anguish he caused? The only thing that is certain now is that while ITV protected him from the consequences of his serious misconduct and abuse of position to distribute lies and defamation against an abuse victim for the defendants, he will face divine justice now. ITV still need to carry out an investigation and indeed so do the instigators of the smear campaign, and even a Jimmy Savile posthumous 'do it when he's dead' investigation is better than nothing. The complaint still stands. The complaint still stands regarding everyone involved and everyone who failed to act. It hasn't gone away because Burgess and his colleagues helped to kill a vulnerable adult to silence powerful men who had done wrong.

I'm aware that across the board, the media got complaints recently about Justin Welby abusing his position and the media to advertise himself and his agenda and cause distress to the general public, something he's done for the whole of his career and something that the media have received complaints against for the same length of time. Justin Welby's behaviour has always been bizarre and unbelievable, and it appears to not just be apathy but the same system that protected Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, the same network of people, which has kept Welby in his position and behaving as bizarrely and callously as he has. He, the same as Gary Burgess, hasn't been held to account for destroying the vulnerable adult in the Jersey and Winchester case.

It is even said that Justin Welby's recent desperate display was because he was afraid of being mentioned in the Maxwell case, although how attacking the British public helps to protect him is unclear, apparently his overlords on the World Economic Forum required it of him. Justin Welby's displays rarely or never relate to Christianity, religious life or the Church of England which is collapsing under him, except, for example when powerful people and abuse are in the public spotlight in relation to the Anglican church, and then he steps in with scripts from the freemason PR firm and profusions of fake apologies, cover-up and press relations games, as was the case in the Jersey and Winchester case, except that Welby himself enabled that horror and the wickedness of Burgess and others in their attacks on the victim and lies about the case, and Welby played a constant active part in the case because of the high profile figures involved. Is Burgess really renowned for his part in cover-up of high profile wrongdoing? Will that be his epitaph?

Last year the Bishop of Winchester was finally disgraced, and the appointments manager who had allowed him to be appointed was sacked. This wasn't done because the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury were finally held to account for publicly destroying a vulnerable adult, indeed the notes on the Bishop's disgrace included his boasting about the Archbishop getting him let off the clergy discipline measure over the Jersey and Winchester matter. The victim, who the church had expected to kill through public disgrace very quickly, went on fighting and took the Bishop to the Clergy Discipline Panel, where Sir Hedley, another in the Maxwell-Epstein Wagon Train, for want of a better expression, threatened her and tried to force the complaint closed, while the bewildered clerk scratched his head and said 'It's okay, I'll refer it to the Archbishop'. Both Welby and Sentamu, both known by many victims for supporting abusers and forcing victims into silence, worked hard to protect the Bishop of Winchester. This is the clergy discipline measure he boasted of wriggling out of. The other notes from the disgrace of the Bishop were the half a million in non-disclosure orders on the Winchester case, given to the former Dean of Jersey and others when the  was removed under excuses and lies that Burgess and friends published with glee, the Dean was in fact forcibly removed, not for wrongdoing but for the negative public impact on the church. The Archbishop claimed to know nothing about the NDA's but was personally involved and proven to be in knowledge of the church NDA's but the press published his lies without investigation.

But the point is, and I'm being very verbal, like HG and J&J, because there's a lot to say here and always has been too much unsaid on this case while only untruth has been published. Every clergy person in the diocese of Winchester, the Deaneries, the Cathedral and Chapter, were made aware by HG of what she was suffering at the hands of the Bishop of Winchester, and the standard 'Ignore her, she's insane' email was sent round by safeguarding and the Bishop's staff. All high profile victims of the Church of England are aware of being defamed this way when they speak up as justice is refused, but ever single clergyperson and member of staff played along to this, showing how very dangerous and corrupt the Church of England is, and yet when clergy and staff were sacked, then they themselves were outraged and worked to oust the Bishop for themselves, these non-vulnerable, salaried and housed adult clergy and staff who would go on to other homes and jobs if dismissed, but they showed horrifying and abusive contempt for a victim who had nothing and who was being killed by the Bishop of Winchester and Archbishop of Canterbury through press defamation and resulting hatred from the general public as she lost her home, her work, her friends, her studies, her volunteering, her whole life.

The poor little clergy and staff who took part in harming the victim were offended when they suffered the same maltreatment even though they weren't defamed in the media for years and were basically able to continue their lives. Gary Burgess wasn't used to attack them with falsehoods.

So what happened in Jersey? Jersey is the home of the powerful gatekeepers to the offshore finance industry, the wagon train of Epstein and Maxwell, the Lords and MPs of the UK, and of course Justin Welby's employers in the World Economic Forum, who most of his unchristian press displays and attempts to influence people are for. It seems that someone miscalculated in getting the Archbishop and the Bishop of Winchester to use the Jersey case as a fake safeguarding showcase as part of the obligatory safeguarding lie that has spanned Welby's career to protect the Church of England from being regulated. The safeguarding lie is a simple equation: Lie to the unquestioning press constantly about how great safeguarding is, how things have changed, and how the church is very very sorry and the victims are very brave, while simultaneously continuing to destroy victims and make them out to be insane when they speak up and search everywhere for justice while the Church of England conflict all sources of justice right up to the Royal family (Maxwell-Epstein Wagon Train), police, judges, Lords, MPs, NHS, Social Services, Charity Commission, charities, even the church abuse charities are run by the Church of England and their violence towards victims, especially the Jersey victim, is legendary.

So, HG, the Jersey and Winchester victim, reported her second abuser in the Diocese of Winchester, when he made it clear he would abuse again and had no care for her collapsed mental state after a year of his sexual and emotional abuse, he even boasted about other abuses. HG was pushed to report when other people spoke to social services and the police, after the church in Jersey had literally looked on while she was abused, when the abuser was supposed to be under supervision because of previous offences.

HG had acquired brain injury, misdiagnosed as Asperger Syndrome as part of many many NHS failures. The NHS never recorded HG's background, told in her book 'Stepping out of the Circle' in brief form, and failed her all her adult life. HG as well as being very determined to gain a better quality of life, was also childlike and obsessed with 'God' from the cult she grew up in, which is how the Church of England got their claws into her and subjected her to years of harm, she was also obsessed with gaining the education which she'd missed out on, and finding the 'family' that she felt she should have had and that she was sure that 'God would send', when the man in Jersey told her that God had sent her to him as a daughter, and it went from there.

The report by the Diocese of Winchester claims all sorts of lies but reality was, HG deliberately and of her own volition escaped the abuser to go and live in a bedsit but he would ask to see her at his work place and at his home, continuing to emotionally abuse her severely as he had all along, and when alone, he groped her as well. She was in a confused state, made worse by the doctor (unfortunately a church member as several Jersey Doctors influencing the case were) giving her xanax as the abuser had made her very sick. These things aren't mentioned in any reports nor the attacks on the victim by Burgess and his colleagues.

Things went downhill fast for HG when the police had a 'gentleman's/freemason's' chat with the abuser and his associates, the abuser's brother being one of the most powerful men in the island. The police released the abuser and immediately violently brutalized HG, and she never recovered but spiralled downhill into despair, which came out as fury at the injustice, as the church shunned her and the story was told from the abuser's side openly throughout the church. HG had to leave the island temporarily as a result and went to Maytree suicide prevention centre, in the meantime her friends in the mainland Winchester Diocese were all influenced by slander of her by the safeguarding office of the Winchester Diocese, all devout churchgoers, they believed every word and shunned HG, she was left with no one and in a terrible state with the Bishop and his wife of the time deliberately adding to that, none of which is in any report. The police at all times aided the church in harming HG and added to it, until she was utterly destroyed and left on the streets, still being defamed by the Diocese who were embarrassed by the fact that she was on the streets of Winchester because of them. They continued to try to use the police against her and used their patronage of the homeless services to drive her out, she slept rough for years until Justin Welby and Tim Dakin, with no thought for her wellbeing whatsoever, published a lying report about her, the report by Jan Korris, was a breach of Jan Korris's role as a counsellor, HG was not her client, and she harmed HG and used her title as a counsellor to do so, which should have led to instant dismissal by the BACP, but she was a church member and protected by the Church of England.

The report was published internationally for no apparent reason other than the false safeguarding programme that the Church of England have had to play out, and yet it was the opposite of safeguarding to traduce a vulnerable adult with false reports and have her attacked internationally by ignorant strangers as well as the network of abusers' families and church members in Jersey and outside. And of course ignorant journalists such as Burgess. The governance of Jersey is hopelessly corrupt and linked to money, power and the high profile abusers such as Savile, Epstein and Maxwell, and also, just as in the UK church, the dignitaries are church members and supporters, so flinging the case into the news caused the powerful in the UK and Jersey to 'take measures' to protect the abusive church and the high profile people involved in the abuse and cover-up. They did as they do, using the press and media to the full to traduce and attack the victim, helped limitlessly by the lies and distortions published by Korris. Also by the fact that the main newspaper in Jersey, the Jersey Evening Post is overseen by the powerful brother of the abuser, mentioned earlier and they published utter hatred and lies against the victim by members of the church.

The church showed how unchristian and ignorant of abuse and vulnerability they were as they and the dignitaries and the media kept up a hateful onslaught for years on end. This kind of smear campaign kills stronger people, celebrities even, and this was a vulnerable adult with no foundation, who was attacked constantly by strangers as a result of media hatred. driven from accommodation and work and left in despair, it never stopped, even in the past few years, there have been articles such as Lord Faulks congratulating the smug Justin Welby over his deliberate interference in the case, and Justin Welby was open, with the Bishop of Winchester, in 'clearing' the wrongdoers before further openly conflicted whitewash investigations had been carried out by in-house church members, Bishops and judges.

Burgess, Gripton, Price and others from the press were at all times clear in their aim to keep publishing lies for the Church and ignoring the victim's side of things, they were vicious and untruthful to extremes. Price had interfered in the case while the victim was in Jersey, publishing lies about the case and threatening the victim, it was made very clear that the media dance to the tune of the Church of England communications teams and would ignore anything said by the victim, so she ran a blog, which was hampered by her severe trauma and mental state from years of the abuse and harm by the Church of England, and which was also ridiculed by the sham charity Macsas, a non-registered charity run by and in a symbiotic relationship with, the Church of England, money in return for cover-ups. The behaviour of macsas dating back to the original abuse in this case has been shocking and dangerous and has at all times been to traduce the victim and silence her, and they do this to other victims.

On top of all this, a group of bloggers in Jersey and connected to Jersey, decided to use the case as ammunition against the Jersey government in what they perceived to be wrong with the government, while several other bloggers used the case to attack the victim.

Reverends Peter Ould and Gavin Ashenden, who use blogging as a kind of outlet for their sexual perversions and misogynistic tendencies, attacked the victim alongside the mainstream media, relentlessly and full of untruth, not least because the only source of information used was the Church of England's own false reports and lying press releases but of course because they wanted someone to attack and scapegoat. Incredibly they have been allowed to go on to pretend to be advocating for abuse victims in the Church of England!!! Although it isn't that surprising as safeguarding in the Church of England is a total sham and so predators like these men, having done as they have done, not just blogging but also doing lying interviews about HG in the Jersey Media, are allowed to access victims in the Church of England.

Ashenden was made to step down from his positions in Jersey and the Queen's chaplaincy, a volunteer role nothing to do with the Queen, because he used that title to embarrass the Queen every time he abused the press to attack a vulnerable person or group. He's spent his time church hopping but seems to have sadly found a home for his malice in the Catholic church, with the press and media still entertaining his hatred and prejudice and calling him 'The Queen's Former Chaplain'.

The other Jersey bloggers are as follows, Rico Sorda, Neil McMurray, Stuart Syvret, Tony Bellews, Bob Hill. There is a further blogger involved, a mentally ill troll called Paul O'Dwyer, who uses the pen name 'Polo' and has worked hard to destroy the victim alongside Ould, Ashenden, Burgess and the rest.

Stuart Syvret is famous for the efforts the Jersey Government went to to silence him over abuse in Jersey, he focuses not just on the centre of power in Jersey and the significance of that power and corruption in relation to the finance industries but the outward-radiating waggon-trains of Epstein-Maxwell and the rest of the powerful figures all linked through the finance industry and child abuse and thus Jersey, the epicentre, Stuart writes about this because Burgess and colleagues don't. Stuart is outstanding, but the Jersey media made him out to be insane on behalf of the powers, to make people disbelieve him, see a pattern? They did the same with Stuart as with HG.

When the Diocese of Winchester continued to destroy the victim publicly, she took the Bishop of Winchester to court. The Bishop was put under an order by the court that the victim had to be included in the reports about her case, something that the Church of England had somehow 'forgotten' to do, all reports excluded the victim thus far. The Bishop hid this by lying to the press while he breached the injunction by not including the victim but instead of explaining he couldn't release the whitewash reports that excluded the victim, he lied to the press and traduced the victim by claiming that 'the reports weren't being released for the sake of her wellbeing' thus continuing to build up press-led belief that the victim was a monster and that the church and powerful people involved were right and innocent.

It was Stuart Syvret who prevented the victim from committing suicide at this point , Stuart, the renowned Jersey Blogger, a better journalist than Burgess, while blogger 'Paul O'Dwyer'/Polo, furthered attacks and traducing of the victim. O'Dwyer's hateful and immoral behaviour in the case beggars belief and on the subject of Burgess dying unrepentant and unpunished, it is a pity that the obituary for Paul O'Dwyer in the press recently was for a different man, but I will return to O'Dwyer and his dangerous behaviour later.

The other bloggers, Rico Sorda and Neil McMurray are bloggers who think well of themselves and see themselves as a kind of 'resistance' against the Jersey government , and used the HG case as a kind of badly aimed 'ammunition'. At no point did they converse with HG to check the accuracy of their blogs about her case and instead left her deeply anguished by publishing lies spread by the Church of England. The horrible psychological twist being that they considered themselves to be 'on HG's side' and the knights in armour, even though they refused to communicate with her, and their aim was generally to further their own cause.

HG contacted them in anguish as she did all media, asking them to stop hurting and shocking her as they, the knights in armour, were hurting her. They didn't take any notice of her but continued to use her case, and astonishingly, despite allowing Paul O'Dwyer to attack her, as he is very close to them and their blogs and spends his long hours on the dole commenting on their blogs, even recently they were seen commenting about the case as if they were on the murdered victim's side despite their part in her destruction. They used her, and it scarred her for the remainder of her life. They never interviewed her, just as Burgess and the rest of the media didn't.

Tony Bellews was a very interesting case, he was terrified that his church, one of the churches who did significant harm to the victim but which he still wholeheartedly supported, would find out that he supported the victim emotionally, he was known as a 'fence sitter' by many in Jersey and he appeared to be dangerously on the fence in this case, afraid of being slandered and shunned himself while at the same time highlighting some of the deep wrongs of the Jersey and Winchester case and the behaviour of people such as Ashenden, although he followed Peter Ould and other abusive priests and laity on social media as well as 'Thinking Anglicans' a site for bored trolls, who attacked the victim violently, Tony turned a blind eye to their attacks on the victim. Tony was the only one to warn the victim when he was blogging about her case, to avoid causing her the shock and trauma that each new article of any kind, mainstream or blog, caused her. Eventually as the church continued to attack her and she couldn't cope, he turned his back on her in favour of the church. It is a shame because Tony's support of the victim and the time and resources he invested in making life less hellish for her was outstanding, it's a shame that while men like Tony tried to help HG, in fear for his own wellbeing, prats like Burgess just led attacks on her and did nothing to record her side of things.

Bob Hill was the main Jersey Blogger involved and sadly he too printed the Church's misinformation over and over, while appointing himself as advocate for the victim, he caused her trauma in huge measure as he claimed to be on her side while reproducing the Church of England's lying reports and the lies of the Church-Government members in Jersey. In Jersey church and government are enmeshed and conflicted as they are in England, but in Jersey government and law are also enmeshed, so the judiciary in Jersey are in government and also Church dignitaries, and this is open, as is the destruction of the victim through these conflictions. Bob tried to untangle the web of confliction but despite HG's accounts of things he refused to accept that the Church of England posed a severe risk to her, or that evidence and statements could be tampered with and distorted, he fought for the victim to have a voice in the investigations and failed, he managed to do tremendous harm to the victim by repeating the Church of England's lies about why they excluded her from her own case and he naively enabled the Church of England to trace and access the victim, when she had explained to him in great detail that she was a fugitive from them for her own safety. This unfortunately led to the breakdown of their relations which the Church hoped for, as they had presumably expected to kill the victim with the first year of press onslaught and hadn't counted on anyone supporting the victim.

Bob continued to try to take things into his own hands, refusing to meet with the victim when he was in the area where she lived, publishing his blogs without warning her, and continuing to publish inaccuracies, but seemingly meaning well, in the same way harming her as McMurray and Sorda did. He decided to file a court case against the Church attack on the victim, without her consent and at the same time as she filed against the Bishop of Winchester, she stopped his court case and was attacked viciously by the Jersey bloggers and their 'fan club' who had no idea of the realities because no one among them knew or asked HG's side and simply decided she'd 'hurt poor Bob' when reality is he hurt her, scarred her for the rest of her days. Paul O'Dwyer, the blogger hanger on, was one of the worst in this case, and I will talk about him before I conclude with Burgess.

Paul O'Dwyer/Polo lives in Dublin, it appears that he's a long term benefits dependent and there is no doubt whatsoever from his behaviour that he's mentally ill. He writes blogs but also hangs on to the Jersey blogs and comments on each post with his opinion, he is obsessed with Jersey, but he has other obsessions, it seems, pornography, Nazis and preying. His behaviour caused deep distress to HG in her vulnerable state.

During the first years of HG being publicly destroyed by the Church of England and the media, 'Polo' as he calls himself on twitter, blogs etc, decided he would be involved in the HG case, alongside other unstable hangers on, another being a woman called 'Julie', who was used by the Church of England to drive a wedge between Bob Hill and HG and trace HG in her hiding for the Church. There were other unstable and dangerous hangers on, who damaged HG in her bewildered state as she had no idea of the agenda or mentality of these people and was desperate in seeking comfort and support as she was blindsided by the violent public attacks on her. She unwittingly enabled Polo, Julie and others, by interacting with them, laughing at and reposting some of Polo's less vile creations and trustingly allowing these unstable people to manipulate her.

'Polo' decided to constantly send her pictures of people involved in her case, which alarmed and bemused her, she was traumatized enough by the whole situation, she didn't want to be reminded of these people and the fact that every single one had escaped justice. But the pictures became increasingly freaky, Polo had an obsession with photoshop and sexuality and nudity and kept sending and publishing nude and sexual caricatures and cartoons, including one of the abuser and one of the powerful Jersey dignitaries who supported him, a number of the Bishop of Winchester naked, which Polo threatened to attribute to HG, And on twitter he sent her photos of the Dean whose full misconduct was never investigated, she begged him to stop and he blocked her. Interesting, an insight into his unstable mentality. Later on he published a lying article supporting the Bishop of Winchester's dishonesty, and refused to remove it when asked by HG, and he also published a page of photos of Jersey dignitaries in Nazi uniforms, this was picked up by the press with horror and complaints were made, but because Polo lived in Dublin, not Jersey, it wasn't easy to bring him to justice.  Obviously, knowing the occupation of Jersey by the Nazi forces, Polo's attack through depicting Jersey people as Nazi's was an act of uncontrolled violence and part of his bizarre obsession with Jersey that can only stem from mental illness. Another obsession he has is sending daily obscure tweets to the Pope's twitter account, it should be funny but this is what more dangerous behaviour is born of. He is what is known on social media as an 'incel'.  His behaviour, although hateful, is carried out in the manner of an irresponsible child who has no idea quite how far he's crossed the boundaries.

After that, police and safeguarding complaints were made about Polo in Ireland because he published a lying attack on HG. He self-pityingly claimed to have 'mistakenly tried to befriend her'. and cried and whimpered about how she mistreated him - mistreated him? He took part in an onslaught against a vulnerable adult and got a reaction. He never befriended HG, he never met her, he ignored or took offense at her requests for him to stop certain behaviours, he took part in falsehoods and sent her pornographic and other offensive pictures and she asked him to stop. Anyway, his article, claiming she had written to him, which wouldn't be the case, gave what he thought was her name, thankfully also not true, but he deliberatedly named her when the press-led hatred of years of her would lead to that putting her life in danger.

Not only that but obviously his hateful defamation of her could be picked up by any potential employer or landlord or anyone associated with her and cause her loss and shame. If it had been her name that he published. He left that up after HG was sent to her grave by the Church of England, Defamation even in death, several years gone now. He was reported multiple times to police and safeguarding and he is known to both, and known to be unstable and a troll who is bored and thus destructive but Dublin is currently a city overwhelmed with problems and he isn't considered the worst, but think about this, it was official journalists such as Gary Burgess who enabled these people to target a vulnerable adult. Burgess who acted for the Church of England's communications department by spreading lies unquestioningly and not interviewing the victim, because the press and media were 'forbidden' by the Church of England to do so and that is the corrupt power of the Church of England.

The further stage of the Leveson inquiry was deliberately stopped, by power, so that the press could go on being used to abuse power and there is no reliable or proper form of regulation either for the UK media and press or the BBC, both run a false, skim-the-surface game of complaint management, as was discovered by HG as the press openly attacked her and enabled her records to be traced and her to be identified and raped, beaten up, hounded etc. The BBC take bad reporting to higher levels all the time, and a lot of it is again about power and who's being reported on. Justin Welby, as guilty as the Bishop of Winchester but powerfully connected, goes on vomiting his worthless and irrelevant agenda into the press even though he has caused the death of a vulnerable adult, his press displays are not to do with his church, they're to do with what his sponsors demand of him, and he himself has many stains on his hands, much more than one death, more than two. But because of the blind and vile media who go on reporting the way that they do, as demanded by the powers, Welby remains and angers the nation incessantly. He recently, maybe for the first time, actually felt the anger of the nation, the feedback that he hides behind staff from in his palace, because his judgement and unchristian behaviour finally went too far in the week before Christmas. He made hokey and Trump-like embarrassed excuses in the vile Church Times, whose part in destroying the Jersey victim was astounding.

Gary Burgess, an outstanding prat and attention-seeking remorseless whiner is dead. One wicked person down, many many more from the unreprentant Jersey atrocity to go. If no justice on earth, I pray that God speeds up all of their journeys to the lake of fire.

HG herself went on crying for justice and suffered the fate that most high profile victims who won't be silent do, if the slander doesn't silence them, and making them out to be insane doesn't work, the Church of England circulars 'He/she's mad, ignore them', then the church moved on to the conflicted police and had HG seriously injured again. The level of serious physical and mental injury that her decades of suffering at the hands of the Church of England caused was on a par to that of a combat veteran. The Church of England made sure HG was again left permanently homeless and without any hope at all of returning to work, despite her years of efforts while the Church of England and Gary and co destroyed her.

The Dean of Oxford, Martyn Percy described his ordeal at the hands of the Church of England as like the 'holocaust' and he had inappropriately touched someone to earn being violently pubicly destroyed, HG had not, all she had done was react to being severely abused by protected known abusers in the Church of England, Percy had his family, his home, an income and stability behind his fight and although he was called 'mad' by the rag Telegraph so was HG and HG had nothing, the Church's violence even separated her from her abusive family. She went back to the Channel Islands as an HG style joke, to say her goodbye, and she looked into the eyes of some of her oppressors but such was the damage that no one recognised her in 2019, and there the story ended. The press are hitmen for those in power in the UK, Gary Burgess towed the line and should have no honour in his death whatsoever, he's outstanding for helping with a murder, nothing else. And here we are, like Ghislaine Maxwell's victims, showing that a press murder cannot bring the silence that those in power hoped for, that the Church of England and Jersey hoped for, there are very very serious crimes and misconducts waiting to be be brought to light, not by a conflicted church-picked ex-policewoman whitewashing the  already damaged evidence for the dignitaries in Salisbury, Winchester, Lambeth Palace and Jersey, but by the first genuine independent review into the whole matter including the incessant lies by the media. Burgess will undoubtedly be happy to miss that in hell.

Jaycey Lescar.

Winchester and Oxford, plus Guernsey and More

I don't blog much. Life is too full, but sometimes C of E madness catches my eye. 

The news says that Martin Percy, Dean of Christ Church Oxford, has been 'cleared' with regards the CDM.

So did they really give that man a nervous breakdown and spend years with the case in the media spotlight for no good reason? 

Of course, because there was no reason for it to become a public fight. The Church of England are dogs returning to their vomit. They turned the Jersey and Winchester farce into a public fight for years, in that case destroying the victim and publicly upholding the Dean before dismissing him quietly with DNA's forbidding the reality to be released. Then there's the Dean of Sheffield's troubled Cathedral, he sank without a sound, with no big connection being made between his resignation and the allegedly very toxic and serious situation within the Cathedral. There's a real Dean problem in the C of E, Deans have a lot of power and appear also to be the whipping boys for everyone else's, or more senior figures' misconducts.

There was a bit of weirdness with a Bishop going to be a Dean a while back, if I recall it was the failed Bishop of Southampton, going to join a previous Bishop of Southampton who was a disgraced safeguarding Bishop who conflicted the Jersey and Winchester matter. Very odd. But as long as the general public don't question a thing. Three Safeguarding Bishops in a row have been connected with the Diocese of Winchester: Paul Butler - Southampton, Peter Hancock, Winchester, and the current Bishop of Southampton - interesting - and they've all played a part in the cover-up of the horrendous Jersey and Winchester farce, where apart from Key's disguised sacking, not a single person has faced a pentalty and a number have been promoted in true C of E tradition.

In Guernsey not so long ago, a longstanding priest was convicted of assaulting a young man. He had gone specifically looking for boys or men to have sex with. He told the court he was bisexual, and yet he was married and also a longstanding priest, so his undeclared bisexuality and need to seek out men without the congregation being aware was an abuse of trust. But it's much worse than that. He approached and sexually assaulted a man who was using a public toilet, without any consent, and claimed to the court that he 'thought the man was giving him signals'. This doesn't appear to have been argued as an empty statement, sex, even with a stranger, has to be consensual, and he approached this young man from behind, when he was obviously urinating and not looking for sex, and molested him, leaving him shocked. It wouldn't make sense to claim that he 'thought the young man had been giving him signals'. But that is what the press published. The priest was convicted, but basically was only given a slap on the wrist while the judge spoke of his 'previous good character'. How many of you think a man who carries out an assault like that has only done such a thing or similar one time?! The priest, not registered as a sex offender as it's Guernsey, was fined £1000 after having a long and cushy life in Guernsey with his expenses paid by the Diocese, and allowed to leave Guernsey for France, where his conviction will be unknown on French databases and possibly English as well, and certainly unknown to the community. Basically he's been enabled. 

After that, the Dean of Guernsey, another dubious Dean, kicked off a PR campaign as the C of E do, that 'after the horse has bolted and we've enabled it' PR campaign that is the C of E's familiar theme.

'We take safeguarding very seriously' he trumpeted, sounding like so many clergy over the past 8 years have after they've failed to safeguard and harmed victims. No, I can assure you that the Dean of Guernsey doesn't take safeguarding seriously, he and his Deanery are extremely compromised, especially in electing the abuser and his replacement who has also harmed a vulnerable person, as vice-deans. Jersey and Guernsey between them have had a succession of guilty, culpable, compromised or abusive Deans and Vice-Deans, indeed it's almost tradition.

'Safeguarding is open, but there are no new cases' read another silly headline. Why was safeguarding closed while abusers, yes abusers, have been allowed to prey on the vulnerable as a result of having a Guernsey residency due to being C of E priests?! And no new cases, what about the unresolved old cases and those in Guernsey church positions who haven't been held to account? I asked the Dean and his team and interestingly, they were unable to respond at all. The Diocese of Salisbury's communications team who trot out the press statements for Guernsey are truly dreadful and have made the Diocese of Salisbury and the Cathedral into laughing stock over the past year, but the thing is, these silly PR statements in the Guernsey Press newspaper, BBC Guernsey and the godawful 'Bailiwick Express' are empty, not expecting anyone to read behind the lines, another C of E tactic, they expect, like the current Prime Minister of England, for what they release for publication to be accepted without question - something to do with the appalling unregulated C of E schools dumbing people down perhaps? 

The Dean blares that 'You can contact the Deanery about any 'concerns' but if you don't want to, you can contact the NSPCC'. A number of issues there. Why does he think people might not want to contact the Deanery, or why they might not contact the POLICE instead if they for some reason feel unable to contact the church, he's implying that people don't trust the church and is trying to field them to an unsuitable organization conflicted by the church, and what about adults? The victim was an adult, are they expected to contact the NSPCC? Interesting point. I will get to that.

Who remember Jimmy Savile doing publicity stunts and answering calls from children on the NSPCC's Childline? And Esther Rantzen saying she'd 'heard rumours' about Savile, and yet from her position in the NSPCC etc, failed to act on those rumours. In 2013, the Diocese of Winchester illegally shared confidential case information with the NSPCC and enabled the senior figure, John Cameron to act on their behalf to distress the victim by contacting her. The NSPCC have been unable to explain why this senior figure was involved when the victim was an adult with no children, a blatant abuse of power among many in that massive farce, and as with rest of the farce, which heavily involves members of the Guernsey Deanery, no action has been taken.

I'm sure those of you who think, can understand that with the dodgy goings on at the NSPCC, the C of E are simply doing as they do throughout England and the Channel Islands, conflicting yet another public body. The NSPCC, police, social services, safeguarding partnerships and bodies, charities including the terrible 'Macsas' who are openly C of E run and for the assistance of cover-up, and bizarre 31:8 (who still haven't got a proper name) also C of E run, and much more, even the NHS, judiciary, politicians, government and law, are conflicted by C of E influence through dual memberships, so basically the Church of England can advocate that the victims turn to anyone conflicted by them, and the C of E's backs are covered, there are few sources of impartial justice and no regulation of how the church record cases or portray their victims. There are hundreds of angry and hurt C of E victims out there, but the current unsuitable Archbishop is sticking to the plan of PR false apologies and false, redacted and whitewashed reports to fool the IICSA who will be gone soon, and the Charity Commission who are being fended of by the Church's Solicitors.

The C of E relies heavily on silence, silence in response to being contacted by victims and those concerned for victims, and they rely on the silence and complicity of all agencies who they conflict or influence. In Guernsey we're talking about Guernsey Safeguarding, Government, probably the court who left the pervert priest to go free and behave as he likes in France, and probably more. Jersey is famously conflicted and that was evident in the number of authorities, agencies, charities and bodies used to destroy the Jersey and Winchester victim over several decades, although UK bodies and UK-Jersey bodies such as the Privy Council and House of Lords were among the players in that. The C of E influence in Government and Lords is one of their biggest fallbacks for avoiding liability. 

It is very concerning to see in England that the C of E are trying to claw their way into colleges and force themselves on vulnerable students through chaplains; the corruption of children through badly regulated C of E schools for the same reason the C of E can run homeless shelters and other charities - government idleness and conservation of funds - is bad enough, it means there is nowhere really safe for children and young people, let alone the vulnerable who have to endure C of E interference while the C of E still don't safeguard. The C of E is basically an almighty parasite, unregulated, dangerous, abusive and constantly filling the press with their unquestioned advertising of themselves, especially after incidents which show them in a bad light. They've had their day and should be making arrangements to transfer schools and all their outlets that make contact with children, young people and the vulnerable to governments and agencies which should be running them or are qualified to run them.

Some weeks ago, the Bishop of Winchester was said to be 'stepping down'. I was curious, but not overly so. He has been, from start to finish, a complete misfit, there has been nothing whatsoever in his behaviours that indicated suitability for senior clergy positions and it would only have been a masonic handshake and agreement that got him there. The C of E don't go much on theology, and these days are not electing on grounds of wisdom, experience or theological knowledge but it's more about money and power and exchanges of favour, so the C of E, already in decline, are losing congregation hand over fist. But Dakin, Bishop of Winchester, was a misfit even among the many inappropriate and needless elections of new Bishops, as the number of Bishops doubled and the numbers of congregations halved, he was never a Bishop, he was a poser after the order of Justin Welby, carefully posed vanity pictures and videos constantly and needlessly spamming up the press in the same way, but he wasn't even a competent manager, and he was dishonest to the point that anyone could see it, but the C of E audience's silence, still unbroken by the little boy in The Emperor's New Clothes, meant his contradictions went unremarked. An example is the Jersey and Winchester farce, Dakin alternated by saying the Dean was guilty and that the Dean wasn't guilty, and did anyone speak, did anyone break the silence? No. He was nasty to abuse victims and the vulnerable while doing a lot of PR shows, presumably that is why he was installed, he was a man after Justin Welby's own heart. Indeed he spent vast amounts of Diocesan money on a PR firm for no good reason.

The Bishop ordered and endorsed a massive amount of money to be spent on paying conflicted and unsuitable 'investigators' to investigate a fraction of a massive case, choosing to investigate only the small part played by a man he had a historic grudge against, the former Dean of Jersey, Robert Key, and making the whole investigation pointless because matters surrounding Key's actions were ignored, and the victim was completely excluded from the whole investigation and left voiceless and incessant lies about her by Key and his circle were published. Never in C of E history has their manslaughter of a victim been so open. The Peter Ball case certainly involved manslaughter and the same breed of violent silencing and use of government officials and Royalty to endorse the abuser, but the power, press and money were not even used to the extent of this case.

 I am not belittling how horrifying the Peter Ball case was and is - colleagues of Ball who were aware of things have remained in their positions to this day unpunished for failing to safeguard, but Dakin's collossal acts of stupidity and cruelty and damage are reigning champion in the C of E's long history of unregulated harm. The Oxford Dean case is a good contender and the Peter Ball case will always be the worst case of a Bishop being allowed to remain when his acts of depravity were known, the cases of John Smyth, linked to Welby and Winchester and Rev Fletcher, are also cases connected to lifelong harm and whitewashed and redacted reviews. But Dakin's unsuitability for position and the harm he did as a result are top of the unsuitable Bishop leaderboards, and neither he nor his wife nor Justin Welby nor colleagues involved have been disciplined or barred as they should be. This is the letter I wrote to Bishop Dakin yesterday (I'm sure I wasn't drunk at the time but I was trying to write from someone dictating the facts), I thought about it last month but I have concerns closer to home that take most of my time and energy and in main, the C of E ignore me as they ignore all criticism and concern, and until that changes, they will never safeguarding.

Open Letter to the resigning Bishop of Winchester.

01/06/2021

Dear Tim Dakin,

I understand that you’re ‘stepping down’. A story that has been around for a few weeks. The ignorant, elderly and naive in your diocese may praise you and be heartbroken and I know Bishops bask in that innocent and misdirected worship, but it’s a sad state of affairs that such innocence is abused by who you really are and what you’ve done. You don't deserve praise, or even liberty. 

I’m glad that you’re stepping down, interested to see it isn’t a massive nuisance national media PR play as most of the bowel movements of the C of E are, and dismayed that you stayed so long and haven’t been made properly accountable for your misconduct, but that is the Church of England, you overstayed your welcome and didn’t have the wisdom or ability to be a Bishop, and that really showed in your destruction of a vulnerable adult first through years of public harm and then through police violence and branding. The headlines shouldn’t be reading of your ‘stepping down’ and thus abdication of responsibility, they should read of your arrest for breaching the court order against you that the vulnerable adult took against you to protect her, and the arrests of those in the C of E and outside who enabled you in destroying and violently silencing your victim.

You should have stepped down before, in 2013, when it was apparent that you’d harmed a vulnerable adult by your foolish and illegal actions, and you certainly should have gone in 2018 when you had her violently abused by police to silence her after your public campaign of discrediting her for years on end didn’t silence her. But the senior clergy in the C of E are collectively without conscience or understanding of responsibility.

I’m sure that you’re aware that the Steel report remains under the court order that you’ve breached multiple times, and you had no right to share it as you have and remain without the right to share it. But what about the victim who you destroyed? Is she dead or in prison or forcibly deemed insane on your behalf in some psychiatric unit because she wasn’t silent after you and Mr Welby heavily abused your power to close down the Jersey and Winchester farce? Or are you still having her chased by the police? And if so, considering the magnitude of your crimes that you weren’t held to account for, why? Something is very wrong with policing systems that favour the powerful and destroy the vulnerable. 

Your stepping down isn’t enough, just as Mr Welby’s suspension for three months isn’t enough, and for him to announce it as a sabbatical in the middle of a pandemic wasn’t appropriate and was hurtful to his church and the general public while the church and the nation are in crisis and the general public can’t take long holidays to suit them. He should be dismissed and facing charges for his part in your slaughter of a vulnerable adult as well as the other cases. It’s bizarre how the church communications lie in order to protect the church’s reputation, when first and foremost the church should be representing Christianity. Your ‘stepping down’ has been very quiet, while Mr Welby’s constant false PR spams up the newsfeeds and gets in the way of real news.

What about your wife, she aided you in harming your victim, is she to also leave all licenced reader positions? And are we to expect you to move to another position where you can harm the vulnerable, like the former Bishop of Southampton, who ludicrously became a Dean after being complicit in your terrible harm? What safeguards will be in place to stop you publicly committing murder as you have done? What has been done about Jackie Rowlands, as her lies and venom towards HG, your victim who she should have protected, destroyed her? Have you made sure that she is banned from all positions relating to the vulnerable, as Jane Fisher should have been as soon as the skewed contents of the Korris report were known? You allowed Jane Fisher to continue in her position and harm HG for two years after the release of the Korris report, while you threatened HG over Fisher’s malicious conviction of her for responding to Fisher’s abuse of her. In every way what you did was repeat all the previous injustices on a magnified scale.

Please make sure loose ends are tied up and that this colossal injustice is addressed. You carried out an attack allowing everyone who ever harmed the victim to defend themselves publicly without giving the victim a voice, and enabled and encouraged the Church Times and other media to run an incessant attack on the victim based on the whitewash reports and the testimonies of wrongdoers, and you yourself threatened the victim on the grounds of unjust police action where those who had harmed the victim had lied to the police and tried to brand the victim insane, just as you and your wife and Jackie Rowlings and Mat Phipps did. You made it clear in 2013 as you threatened the victim, that whatever you were doing was not an investigation into the wider picture of wrongdoing in the Diocese but appeared to be more about your old grudges with Bob Key. You spent a huge amount of money on one narrow part of a huge picture, and omitted the victim, the key witness, from all of those conflicted reports, costing the church a huge amount for nothing, and there was no reason to put a vulnerable life in danger by using the press as a voice for the church against the victim. If you couldn't see the safeguarding failure, you should never have been a Bishop. 

You still need to address several decades of police injustice against your victim, and all of the press and media slaughter of her, especially the abhorrent behaviour of the Church Times in misleading the general public and publishing hate against the victim. As you know, Bishops ‘step back’ or ‘retire’ to avoid accountability, and leave the matter to the next Bishop, as Michael Scott-Joynt did, and the victim went after him in distress to demand justice and closure as she was left homeless and destroyed, and was accused of insanity and all the rest of the lies by Scott-Joynt and Fisher as a result as they had her brutalized and attempted again to have her imprisoned, and then you came along and attacked her and threatened her over it instead of investigating, what will the next Bishop do to slur your dead victim’s name and protect you?

Tell me again why you thought destroying her was a safeguarding exercise? I was one of many who saw through it all, but the Church of England, as you know, ignore all correspondence and pitilessly force their stories on the general public and clergy without being accountable. What have you done about the Church Times and their safeguarding and professional failure of publishing lies and attacks on a vulnerable adult, what have you done about an investigation that publishes her story in reply? What have you done about ensuring that Paul Handley and his team are banned from journalism for life? And about those in your current and past deaneries of Romsey, Andover, Basingstoke, Guernsey and Jersey who have committed severe misconduct? What was the huge sum spent on, between 2013 and 2016? When not a single culpable person has been held to account or punished and some have been promoted when as a result of their abuses and their attacks on the victim, they are a safeguarding risk to extremes! Especially knowing that the church will actively protect them and silence victims. And the National Safeguarding Team, a joke if there ever was one, what has been done about banning Mssrs Tilby and Johnson and Jane Dodds, Moira Murray, Caroline Venables and the rest from access to the vulnerable, after they allowed this wholesale destruction and showed no understanding of safeguarding whatsoever and instead broke the law and attacked the victim? Don’t go before this is resolved and all involved are held to account, because you didn’t carry out a safeguarding exercise into what Michael Scott-Joynt did and didn’t dismiss Jane Fisher instantly, so it’s unlikely that the Bishop taking your place will carry out an investigation into your public slaughter of a vulnerable adult.

Several years ago, when your victim was homeless and destroyed by you, she contacted all your clergy, as ever not as ‘harassment’ but because you are a danger to the vulnerable in the way you abused your position to utterly destroy her and leave her homeless and voiceless, in much the same way she contacted people over Michael Scott-Joynt’s actions, if you try to crush and suppress someone completely, while they still have life and know they’ve been wronged, they will speak as best they can, and only the church of england would kill someone in any way possible to silence them this way. Now when your clergy were contacted, they as one, showed that they had no understanding of safeguarding and would rather allow a vulnerable adult to die than their Bishop’s serious misconduct be exposed, and as you know, emails by a member of your clergy and Moira Murray, defaming and traducing the victim and ordering the other clergy in the diocese to ignore her, were published. What has been done about Moira Murray’s criminal behaviour and the complicity of those clergy, especially the ones circulating the defamation?! And Jackie Rowlands, what has been done about barring her for life?! You are responsible for Jane Fisher not being immediately dismissed when you took your position, you are responsible for employing an unqualified and inexperienced safeguarding lead, Jackie Rowlands, who instead of addressing the serious misconduct, decided to be offended by the victim speaking up and criticizing her, you are responsible for Rowlands lying to police and harming a vulnerable adult. Walking away with this not addressed, is a serious misconduct, you remain responsible for this.

As you know, Jackie Rowlands, your ‘safeguarding lead’ was so unqualified and untrained, that she took offence at the victim raising the matter of your and her failures, and the police tried to convict your victim of ‘Being angry with people who tried to help her’ -basically her response to being emotionally and sexually abused by pastoral couples in the Diocese of Winchester, her story still unrecorded, as well as the victim’s letter criticizing Rowlands for her failure to address you being a danger to the vulnerable, as if these were crimes and your public destruction of the victim through whitewashes and the hate-stirring lie-publishing media were not. The police, who have a long history of violence and harm to the vulnerable, especially those they silence for the Church of England, those in the Peter Ball and Kendal House cases for instance, seriously injured your victim and repeated Jackie Rowlands lie about the injunction the victim took against you. How and why did a vulnerable adult living homeless and in severe poverty and without representation manage an injunction against the Bishop of Winchester, and why did you lie to the press in 2016 to traduce the victim and cover that up? And why is the Church of England not employing proper safeguarding staff and not training their clergy in safeguarding response even after the recent years of the PR false safeguarding being overridden by the press reporting on the C of E failures? 

The victim, with autism, and reactive attachment disorder from a horrifying childhood in which she was denied school, medical help and any form of support, reacted to members of your diocese emotionally and sexually abusing her, and this is a reason to have her dragged from her home and violently brutalized and left homeless? This is a reason for you to enable the Church Times, Jersey Evening Post, BBC Jersey and others to launch onslaughts of hatred against her on behalf of those who wronged her?!

Your stepping down is simply an abdication of responsibility for this, and you should never hold another position of authority again. The National Safeguarding Team traduced the victim and paid for a biased and illegal ‘report’ against her by a psychologist who never met her, in order to silence anyone who spoke up about the case, rather than demanding your immediate removal and barring for life and ensuring that the prolific defamation of the victim was removed from the internet and media archives – yes, defamation because you enabled her name and details to be released to the general public and many many people knew who she was but not her side of things and most of what was published was inaccurate or untrue. Can you imagine anyone having to live through that? It would kill a strong and stable person. 

As you know, Justin Welby made his support of the destruction of the victim very open, sabotaging a clergy discipline complaint against you immediately after going on BBC Jersey to uphold the wrongdoers and traduce the victim in the middle of the whitewash conflicted investigation, making the investigation into an open joke and farce as he said he believed no wrong had been done, he hasn’t ‘stepped down’ nor taken responsibility for the Smyth and Fletcher cases and his part in the cover-up, before his recent suspension he was still, no lessons learned, offering fake PR apologies and more fake investigations there, after being forced by legal means into a meeting with the Smyth victims by their money and power. That fakery looks to continue indefinitely. 

I’m sure that you’re aware that Mr Bob Hill, BEM, gave up three years of his retirement to try to protect your victim from your public destruction of her. An effort was made by Jane Fisher, John Gladwin and Christine Daley to drive a wedge between them to prevent the victim’s life being defended by Mr Hill, and as a result, Mr Hill collapsed after significant damage was done, this is akin to Fisher using Philip LeClaire against the victim after the victim forbade any contact between them, a legally binding assertion of her wishes, and not investigated by you. You would have killed the victim within months if it hadn’t been for Mr Hill and his friends, but as it was, you didn’t withdraw your attack on the victim at any point and thus you killed both of them, and very slowly and horribly in the victim’s case, you simply couldn’t have inflicted more or worse harm if you’d tried, and to justify it? You, never having met your victim, blamed her, having never recorded her story, judged and condemned her. That merciless psychopathic abuse of power isn’t normal, it’s only present in an organization which isn’t held to account by any body or any governance.

The Churches in Jersey operate in the same way as Immanuel Church Wimbledon, the home of #FletcherCulture. Evil is seen as a blessing and victims are treated with callous disregard. That hasn’t changed by a PR appointment of a ‘safeguarding rector’ who has failed to address this case or see the suspension of the clergy and laity involved in this case and the investigation of the many safeguarding failures, some serious, that HG witnessed, it hasn’t changed through Trevor Willmott’s lies about ‘safeguarding is good in Jersey’ which left the victim off sick from work to see that headline when not one of those who harmed her was called to account, it hasn’t changed through another conflicted chosen investigator illegally accessing records and abusing their power for more whitewash ‘past case reviews’. The victim and her representative still suffered and died, those in the church, the police, the media, the NHS, safeguarding, and other conflicted bodies haven’t been held to account. So you have some work to do before you go, and it isn’t the responsibility of the next Bishop or anyone else. It’s your responsibility. Even the inaccurate perceptions of the Jersey bloggers on the case, when they used it to highlight the unjust Jersey systems without the victim’s agreement are your responsibility. All of it is, and yet you’ve sacrificed lives to protect your position and the church of England, the opposite of what Jesus taught and expected.

What you and your church did was you conflicted and ruined HG's police, medical, social services and safeguarding records so that she would never be heard or credible, you effectively forcibly drove her from help, ensuring she could never trust or have a meaningful relationship with the authorities who failed and harmed her because of the C of E. Essentially you left several sexual abusers and numerous spiritual and emotional abusers with access to a vulnerable adult, and took away her access to work and support by giving her a criminal record when she had no other convictions or record outside of standing up to religious abusers, you left her with the choice of a lifetime in poverty and shame and terror of police beatings which would likely kill her after causing a series of serious injuries, or death.  And at the same time, the church of England allow a man like Gavin Ashenden, who used the media and press to incessantly attack HG and lie about her, as well as his string of media attacks on vulnerable groups, to currently act out his grudge against the C of E by pretending to advocate for other C of E victims. The Church of England is completely devoid of safeguarding.

It’s your responsibility that the police in Jersey traduced the victim after their violent and dishonest behaviour to her previously, and your enablement of them covering that up publicly as a result of you making the case public for no reason, your responsibility that the victim’s efforts to leave the streets and rebuild her life were constantly ruined by you, until she could no longer try, your responsibility that lies were published, your responsibility that those in the Diocese who harmed her are enabled and empowered to go on harming. Your responsibility for working hard to make the victim out to be insane as your predecessor did, to cover up driving her insane. Your responsibility that you took a senior position with no training in or understanding of, trauma, vulnerability, the effects of abuse, and safeguarding. There is nothing that indicates why you became a Bishop, nothing in your behaviour or actions which indicates either theological knowledge, compassion, wisdom or responsibility. You are the face of the destruction of the church of england.

No explanation has ever been given as to why you and Bob Key have been allowed to ‘step down’ as if you have honour, while a vulnerable adult was publicly destroyed. No explanation has been given for that public destruction and your and the national safeguarding team’s behaviour towards the victim’s response. There is no safeguarding in the C of E. And singularly, the church of England, at Deanery, Diocesan and National level, remain unable to respond properly to safeguarding complaints, from perpetrators in the Guernsey Deanery being promoted to vice dean, one after another and a PR farce being made of it, to the unresolved Jersey and Winchester public murders and why no one prevented them to the full case background unrecorded and a whitewash by Heather Steel and and a malicious 'psychological' report being used as the victim's record, to the failure to remove clergy and laity who have been part of your Jersey and Winchester farce, the biggest safeguarding farce in C of E history. While the C of E cannot communicate with the ‘common people’ or respond well, the safeguarding danger remains as it always has been, no change, no improvement.

You did one thing for HG, you and Justin Welby, your public destruction of her, as well as being seen by her friends, community, employers, college, churches, volunteer projects etc, was seen by her abusive family, and you permanently estranged her from them, albeit in a very humiliating and nasty way. It is hard for a person to cut ties from their family due to loyalty, but you cut the ties, and her family being a sort of church of England in miniature, that was no bad thing and the only small benefit to her wellbeing during your protracted and sadistically cruel murder of her although of course it simply added to her suffering at the time, you managed, as Scott-Joynt and Fisher managed for her father’s death, to cause anguish around her mother’s death. It wouldn’t be put past the church and their complicit police to have used HG’s family against her, but as they had abused her too, they wouldn’t be reliable character references, would they?! Any more than those wrongdoers in the Jersey and Guernsey Deanery using the press to attack her, enabled by you! However, you had no right to estrange HG from anyone, nor destroy her work, her home or her degree course, as you did. 

You had a vulnerable adult destroyed by abusing every ounce of your power, because you’re part of a dangerously unregulated and conflicted organization, but you were ‘offended’ that the victim kept on appealing for help, the same as she did to Michael Scott-Joynt, and you, like him, had her arrested, branded for life, violently brutalized, and left homeless and destroyed. How many times do you think a strong person could survive such horror? Let alone a vulnerable adult with no foundation due to the abuse. Get to work, you can’t leave until you’ve resolved all of this, it isn’t the responsibility of the next Bishop or a conflicted faker whitewashing past cases without the permission of victims for the sake of church of England PR! I’m aware that the Diocese of Winchester are liable for you and don’t want to be, but you are liable for yourself, so do the right thing. On the subject of the Diocese, your Chief Executive and his staff were actively involved in harming the victim. Oh, and don't forget that the unprofessional and criminally compromised 'forensic psychologist' used to traduce and silence HG for the national safeguarding team should have immediately been relieved of their duties. He never met HG, went by the lies of wrongdoers, and obviously didn't even read her daily blog, life after the diocese, as she tried to survive the way she was being murdered. 

Finally, this is a safeguarding complaint, even though the C of E don’t safeguard and have made it clear they don’t intend to, to the point of setting up yet another non-independent independent safeguarding regulator, the same as the new same-old clergy discipline measure, but the complaint stands, just as the Peter Ball case stood in the same circumstances, even after the C of E caused the death of a victim, his voice didn’t go away even with (also guilty in the HG case) Paul Butler's sickening use of him for a PR stunt, neither does the voice of your victim, sadistically slain to protect you and many powerful wrongdoers.

Sincerely,

Mr John Carter.