A letter in frustration

 Dear Church House,

Lambeth Palace has quite a big problem with receiving and responding to concerns, so I'm sending this concern to you.

I'm sure that you're aware of the recent two-week advertising campaign by Justin Welby, which started before Easter, just after the news that the victims of Fletcher and Smyth, close associates of Justin Welby, were yet again denied justice as a result of redacted reports and refusal by senior leaders to resign over their part in the cover-ups.

As well as appearing totally insensitive to the distress that he causes victims when he does his advertising campaigns, Justin Welby appears out of touch with his own distressed church and without proper modulation or instruction on what he releases into the media. Both Justin Welby and Lambeth Palace seem unable to process the responses to the advertising campaigns, which is going to prevent his recent aim, stated in the financial times, of making the church more appealing to the secular world.

As things currently stand, the only group he is making the church attractive to is paedophiles. Because the widespread anguish of victims in response to Justin Welby's advertising campaigns, and the way that Lambeth Palace ignore these victims and everyone who gives feedback and complaints on the back of Mr Welby's advertising, indicates that the Church of England will remain a closed fortress, the only victims with a voice in the press in answer to Mr Welby are the Smyth victims, who have enough money and power behind them to be successful in being heard. The secular world are not going to find an archaic closed fortress attractive unless they want to be able to abuse people and power and be protected, for that is what the church of England have a reputation for; well, that and being ridiculous and out of touch.

Mr Welby's advertising campaign was launched immediately as the victims of Fletcher were left in shock, very callous and inappropriate, victims were crying in shock and anger. The failed safeguarding Bishop, Paul Butler, whose misconducts are many, still hasn't resigned or been suspended, Justin Welby and the church of England's usual response to being exposed for misconduct is the advertising campaign and this recent one has been a bumper one, leaving victims reeling. Some of his most stomach-churning vanity advertising has been seen during the pandemic while the congregation of the C of E have been left in confusion, Mr Welby makes headlines by 'secretly' causing a safeguarding and health risk interfering on covid 19 wards when he claimed to have had pneumonia and isn't medically qualified, he made minds boggle when he showed off his kitchen as an advertising stunt, and then this recent vanity run, he posed holding a phone and pretended to be on the phone to the Queen.

Apparently the Queen told him to talk to the press about Prince Harry's wedding, which isn't appropriate. And presumably she told him that the Duke of Edinburgh was about to die. But did she tell him to say that being in the Royal Family was a life sentence without parole, immediately before the Duke of Edinburgh died? It is widely wondered if Mr Welby's communications team deliberately set him up for these unpleasant gaffes as they happen so frequently. But more of us think that what happens is, Mr Welby has a relief carer who doesn't make him take his medication and he goes out of control until his normal carer returns.
His Easter messages were just scripted tripe, irrelevant to anyone and could have been trotted out by any politician. The Archbishop of Wales' message of hope was more respected, Welby just kept muttering about 'A better future for all'. Which is typical of what his script writers turn out, irrelevant.

If Mr Welby wants the church to be more relevant to the secular world, he needs to stop tearing his church apart, restore respect and dignity to those who work to uphold it, stop the vanity advertising, stop ignoring the general public who contact Lambeth Palace or give feedback on news articles, stop ignoring abuse victims, and take responsibility.

A failing and very troubled organization with unsuitable Archbishops isn't attractive to the general public - secular or Christian, and hundreds of Christians who have given a lot of time to the church of England have had to leave because of Mr Welby. Does he really expect to replace those people with non-Christians? Does he really not understand what he is saying? Sometimes you have to wonder if he is fully lucid. He doesn't have the general public's support because his behaviour and words are not okay. Whoever writes the joke scripts finds the pettiest of cliches and Mr Welby appears to think that he will gain the general public's favour by trotting these out rather than being a Christian role model. 'Cancel Culture'. Pitiful to see a man who is supposed to be the leader of the Christian church trotting out such cliched non-expressions. The church of england has fallen hard.

'Cancel Culture'. Mr Welby has destroyed abuse victims in cover-ups, he has cancelled lives, most notably the disabled female victim who he and his safeguarding team publicly assassinated, and who he and his safeguarding team are still not prepared to redeem. Mr Welby committed open and criminal misconduct in that case in conjunction with peers, judges, Lords, Politicians and authorities, and that isn't an isolated case. Mr Welby should be looking at 'Cover up Culture' and his own misconduct. The fact that he and senior leaders involved in the misconducts of that case and others are still not stepping down, says more than any vanity advertising run. It is a daily abuse to the victims of Mr Welby and the senior leaders to have to endure seeing these men in the press and media with advertising and meaningless ramblings.

Of course there is plenty of feedback to the C of E advertising campaigns. But as I said, it is ignored by the church. At the moment there is a petition against an abusive clergyman being reinstated, which will be ignored by the church. There are victims crying out in anger on social media. There are articles in the smaller media. For example a very astute article picking apart Mr Welby and the Bishop of Dover's cruel and bullying accusations against their own congregation of racism. You cannot simply accuse people en masse of racism without any grounds, it is a very nasty and unjust thing to do. And then there's the more recent article by Linda Woodhead, an extract below which made me think of you.

'It explains why those who try to blow the whistle are ignored or traduced, and why bad news has to be hushed up. It explains why so many large and costly ‘comms’ teams are employed by dioceses, Church House and Lambeth to pump out good news and bury bad. It explains why truthfulness is not a value you ever hear preached. This all makes sense because there is institutional grandiosity to defend, and an ‘it’ to be denied'.

That out of touch and narcissistic advertising campaign by the archbishop, followed by all criticism or concerns being ignored, will be the death of the church of england, and all the money in the world, all the power to corrupt government and Lords, authorities and press, won't save the C of E. Each time letters, emails, phonecalls, feedback on press articles and articles criticizing the church are ignored, or those who speak up are attacked or made out to be mad, it is another nail in the church of england's coffin, and it beggars belief that Mr Welby can talk about making the church more attractive to the secular world when he is destroying it for Christians and for all.

All the money being wasted on a very poor PR representation of the C of E, easily seen through and an imposition on the general public, could be being used to reform the church of england, and to implement safeguarding, because as long as the Bishops of Manchester, Bristol and Southampton and the NST continue to ignore the safeguarding complaint made against Justin Welby and other senior leaders, a serious and amply evidenced matter, as long as it remains that Justin Welby does his vanity advertising while he knows he's guilty of manslaughter through his actions, and nothing is done about that serious matter, there is no safeguarding, no prospect of the church of england being attractive to anyone, and no future for the church of england.

Links:  https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/inside-the-minds-of-church-sex-abusers/

            https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/white-anglican-and-cancelled/

            https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-dare-cofe-leaders-imply-our-pews-are-filled-with-racists/

Response to the Anglican Church's Response to the IICSA report so far

 Dear Press and Media Outlets, 

It is important that you are aware that publishing only the Church of England's response to the IICSA report, as you are doing already, is an insult to victims and further harm to those silenced and denied justice by the church.

For 7 or 8 years now the Church of England have endured routine falsehoods about safeguarding, false apologies and false reports from the Church of England via the media and newspapers. 

Nothings shrieks falsehood more loudly than 'apologizing in advance' and repeating the vague falsehoods of huge compensation sums and care already falsely raised in February as a PR stunt, but being unable to explain how, if safeguarding isn't improved and victims who have been forcibly silenced by the church are not reached, this show money is going to make any difference.

It is sad to see that the new safeguarding Bishop, Jonathan Gibbs, and his associate safeguarding Bishops are as ineffectual and PR focused as the previous so-called 'safeguarding bishops'. I made a serious formal complaint to Jonathan Gibbs and the associated Bishops some months ago and despite it being a safeguarding emergency, a vulnerable adult seriously harmed from criminal misconduct by the Archbishop of Canterbury and other senior figures, the response has been appalling. Gibbs himself has tried to fob me off, while the others have failed to respond at all. And yet they have time to try to gloss over the current dangerous mess that the church of England is in response to survivor Gilo: (seaofcomplicity.bog) speaking up about the situation.

The church of England continues as it always has, to treat abuse as irrelevant except when it affects the church's image, then their cruel and psychopathic attitude to victims is glossed over and they scramble eagerly for press attention and fake but desperate apologies and protestations about safeguarding improving that harm the victims who they are refusing justice to.

The Church of England provide fully for abusive priests, from legal support to housing and pension. Each clergyman who is convicted knows that they have a comfortable future, unlike their victims who may never live a full life. This support of rapist clergy, having gone on for decades on end, has amounted to far more paid out to offenders than the church of England are pretending to offer to victims. As ever, when the church virtue signal and pretend to carry out virtuous and altruistic projects, the press slurry sprays it all over the suffering victims of the church, and the outcomes, the results, are never heard of, the victims, their voices of no worth to the press who print the church's lies without question, go on shouting as loud as they can, and are barely heard. Many many victims have no voice at all, and some are even afraid to speak, seeing how others have been crucified.

The church are making excuses about helping victims in 'distressed circumstances' while they provide for all paedophile and rapist clergy, but the excuses and loopholes regarding the compensation scheme will leave many victims without help, including the victim who Justin Welby had publicly destroyed with the help of the press and media and cronies in judiciary, law, Lords, police and others, the case that Jonathan Gibbs and his colleagues apparently daren't even respond to emails about. Many victims, those forcibly silenced by the church and accused of insanity, harassment or pestering for persisting in asking for justice in a distressed state and being denied it for the sake of the church's image or because their abusers weren't convicted, are unlikely to receive anything, and their suffering will be intolerable as the compromised IICSA report is used as a PR slurryfest by the C of E, who love to turn their shame, scandal, crimes and corruption into limelight and fake remorse.

Baroness Butler-Sloss and Fiona Woolf, both Anglican Church dignitaries and in the case of Butler-Sloss, guilty of harming abuse victims to protect the C of E, were allowed to lead and compromise the IICSA inquiry and access evidence, leading to victims not believing that the inquiry would bring justice. Not a murmur was made by the C of E or press about these conflicts. Why didn't the profusely false apologizing Bishops and Archbishops act swiftly on this for the sake of the inquiry's integrity, as it is, some believe that the report will be a whitewash, and some Anglican victims have personally been hurt by the inquiry. But the statutory fake apologies have to be rolled out, and Mr Welby actually seems to enjoy such things, self-flagellating with glee in front of everyone, which creepily reminds me of the Smyth case.

As I said before the recent synod, this is going to be an incredible slurryfest for the church in the press. An extra synod strategically placed just before the IICSA report, what new lies can the church cook up to try to take the attention off the reality of the report?

It was a bit of a feeble one, the repeat of February's false boasts about recompense and care for victims, the only addition really, was that because victims have brought a complaint against the Archbishop's council for their barbaric behaviour towards abuse victims, and that complaint is aimed towards the Charities Commission, the Archbishop's Council were strategically to look as if they voted unanimously in favour of the compensation and care move. Funny isn't it? These men have shown utter hatred and contempt for victims and have taken part in cover-ups that have destroyed victims, and suddenly, for the sake of the media reaction, they all care very much.

Not enough to refrain from nasty attacks on their own clergy in the letters column of the Telegraph because they felt threatened by what was written about the diminishing congregation, not enough to personally apologize to the victims they have harmed, and resign, but enough to 'be seen' by the press, showing off the pre-arranged 'unanimous' vote for something already arranged in February for the last synod's PR, but the press don't question the church nor do they print the other side of the story, our side, the victims' side, the side of those the church has harmed, the side of the many of us who have had to leave the church of England because of the serious corruption and abuse of power. The press have a short memory indeed, to keep printing conflicting outbursts by Welby.

In the event of the safeguarding bishops failing to respond well to the case of Justin Welby and other senior clergy's serious and criminal harm to a vulnerable adult, I referred the case to the new Archbishop of York, he used his own serious misconduct in an abuse complaint as his opening PR show as Archbishop as is becoming standard with clergy, they enter office with an apology that is supposedly to gain them favour, even though it is inconceivable, but the new Archbishop received my complaint and was obliged to act upon it. When I wrote later, having not received a response, he had blocked my email. The previous Archbishop of York and the ongoing assistant, Daphne Green, were involved in the complaint I made and would need to be investigated too. So a change of management brings no change in attitude.

The congregation of the church of England is down to the size of a large cult. They have no genuine safeguarding but work according to archaic rules that state that the vulnerable are an insurance liability and a risk. The C of E spam the press relentlessly with virtue signalling, falsehoods about safeguarding, and their interference in politics. No other denomination or religion in the UK is even allowed to abuse the papers and media this way. Or is it that the press refuse to give them the opportunity? Every whim, fancy or lie by the church of England is published without question. And the press slurry about the IICSA report began on synod week, so victims are having to endure a very long run of the publicity that causes them so much distress. Tomorrow's major outpouring of falsehood by the Church of England may kill some victims who know that as the falsehoods continue, they will remain without justice.

For years, Justin Welby and Bishops led a public character assassination against a vulnerable adult who had been abused by two serial abusers in the C of E, one of the abusers had been sacked from official positions at one church, only to be moved to another, with his powerful legal, judicial and government friends supporting him, and had been in a position to abuse this vulnerable adult as a result. The other serial abuser was a magistrate, also well connected. Neither men paid for the abuse, Justin Welby made the victim pay, by allowing all the powerful friends of the defendants to destroy her publicly, in the unquestioning and eager press and media. The victim was presumably supposed to suicide and be labelled as insane under such onslaught because even strong people can't survive such violence, but went on fighting for justice and a voice, so she was accused of 'harassment' and subjected to violent police assault and imprisonment and left homeless and seriously injured, as she remains while Welby keeps up his vanity shows.

 Most people wouldn't survive these matters but they are the very tip of the iceberg in this story. The vilification of the victim remains in archived press and media and occasionally a repeat attack on the victim is launched. The press and media onslaught led to physical attacks on the victim which destroyed her life over and over. The Church of England's safeguarding leads even encouraged other victims and the two conflicted 'church abuse' charities, while Macsas and 31:8, undeclared as run by church of england safeguarding members to protect the C of E, also played a strong part. 

Justin Welby and Stephen Cotterel, with all their fake apologies, are failing to take responsibility for this. Jonathan Gibbs and the Bishops of Southampton and Bristol are failing to act on what is a safeguarding emergency and a case that involves criminal actions by senior clergy and authorities influenced by the church. The Bishop of London often reminds victims of how there is no safe place for victims of the church to turn, as she advertises herself leading services for NHS, Police, Judiciary and more, making sure that those wronged by the church know just where they stand, and of course many victims do find out the hard way that reporting C of E misconduct will lead to harm to them from the authorities and malicious misreporting, as happened with the victim mentioned above and others such as Theresa Cooper found out. None of this will be mentioned in the PR slurry from the church in response to the IICSA report, which is why I am mentioning it. Even a small voice in reply is a voice. Justin Welby's effusive empty apologies which he has trotted out routinely for years and had published, even though a published apology is a stunt and not a directed apology to the party concerned, are so hypocritical considering what he has done.

The matter of John Smyth, Justin Welby has changed his story on that unquestioned by the press, and has seriously failed victims to the point of being under investigation, but the press and authorities are silent, he has included the Smyth victims in the fake apologies for the press, but as with the previous matters, he has failed to take responsibility for his actions and inactions; in fact one thing Justin Welby seems unable to do, is take responsibility for himself or even look at himself and his bizarre behaviour. His tenure as archbishop has been a disaster, people have abandoned the church in droves, his frequent silly and offensive press releases shouldn't even be published, and as he is under investigation for even just one of his misconducts, which the media have been muted about, he should be suspended at very least, and not distressing victims with more false sorrow. 

But the press don't question this, let alone print it. The press printed the new Archbishop of York's PR stunt apology for his misconduct, but he shouldn't have been installed under such a cloud, it makes the church of England worthless. And his subsequent refusal to deal with Welby's misconduct when the new and already failed safeguarding bishops refused, compounds the air of total futility and falsehood that the Church of England's lifeline press and media presence displays. 

It is overused but Jesus told His disciples 'Do such as this unseen', and this week we have seen a real charm offensive from the church in the media ahead of the IICSA, worse than usual, blatant virtue signalling and pretences of care to poor and vulnerable groups from the elderly millionaire Bishops in their palaces. Without the press, what would be left? Dying parish churches and the monsters of the Lambeth Palace and Church House corporation. The corporation is operating under false pretences, using the Name of Jesus for a money and power game and endless harm to the vulnerable. 

The press can and should help victims by bringing the PR to an end and giving the church of England the choice of returning to Christ or disbanding. The C of E have no right to offend the nation with their hogging of the press for irrelevancies and falsehoods.

tiredly and sincerely, 

John Ian Carter

A safeguarding letter to the Daily Telegraph

Dear Daily Telegraph,

I am writing regarding the safeguarding matter of your publication of Justin Welby's every whim and fancy. I am sure that you are aware that Mr Welby is under investigation for harm to abuse survivors. Although the headlines on that were muted, unlike many by the c of e where they use abuse and misconduct as a bizarre boast.

An individual or body under investigation should not have the privilege of press limelight it is a safeguarding failure as it distresses victims. Sadly Welby's recent blaring is considered to be a warm up act before weeks of this slurry because of the synod and then the release of the conflicted redacted compromised iicsa report. The iicsa have failed to rein in the church's incessant irrelevant splattering in the paper despite the distress to victims.

And the thing is Welby didn't even have anything relevant to say, his whole compromised career as archbishop, he has tried to use public feeling in order to gain glory, he looks where people are heading and tries to rush to lead them while they turn away in disgust, popular opinion is that he's a charlatan and a hypocrite, as you will have seen on the comments  - it is too late for him to change his image and curry favour ahead of the iicsa, which is all his stunt was about.

Over the summer, whoever at the Telegraph is bankrolled by Welby or his powerful sponsors was obviously away. We had some refreshing truths about the centralized monster power hungry church. The failed CDM and the suffering of victims, the faked new CDM which is no better - was that the Telegraph? The c of e policy is that when they are shown up, they pretend to change, waste a lot of money and time and return to business as usual.

Simon Butler's representation of the archbishops council in his out of touch rant in the Telegraph spoke volumes. That is the c of e, not fake care for a public that they are too far above to know.

As Welby rants, his extreme irony is lost on him, he and his cloned daughter, the Bishop of London trying to tell the government to decentralize when he has spent 7 years turning the church into a centralised unchallenged unregulated monster of power while parish churches die is hysterical. He really is without insight and seems awash in his own imagined importance. 

During the recent crisis the c of e have provided nothing for their flock and Welby banned priests from entering their own churches. The c of e became purely centralized, with Welby having to advertise his vanity show from his kitchen in advance to get the voyeurs' viewings. Every time we wonder how much lower he can go, he surprises us.

The c of e response to the pandemic was closure of churches, boasts about closure of churches, hiding their wealth in the Tower rather than helping those hit by crisis, Welby's pitiful kitchen stunt, etc. The Telegraph briefly seemed to turn over a new leaf by exposing some of the idiocy of the church and by enabling thousands of people to comment about it. But now whoever the church pays for telegraph publicity is back from holiday and we have the paradoxical hypocritical Welby saying 'don't do as I do, do as I say' , and however bad the situation is, a man guilty of what Welby is guilty of, is in no position to lay down the law.

The Bishop of London was elected as a virtue signaller, a sickly sweet false advert in a patriarchal church who would have been forced to have female bishops by the government if they had failed to agree. Her communications team, paid for by innocent communicants is a professional disaster management team on call 24 hours a day, indicating that something has gone seriously wrong. What would Jesus think? 

The Bishop of London is complicit in one of the biggest cover-ups in the c of e and at the expense of a vulnerable life, one that her pseudo dad, Welby is responsible for, she keeps up a constant show of how the church conflict the police, judiciary, the NHS and more, to assure church victims that they have nowhere to turn for safety. 

It appears as the church declines that she will be the next archbishop, she's so similar to Welby in crawling, lack of conscience, virtue signalling and making the church about show and interference while killing all signs of Christianity. 

Welby's sponsors will love her and have presumably groomed her for archbishop, but neither of them, nor their sect, are relevant to the general public any more. It is a bit like the prime minister claiming to be medically trained. 

Only the senior clergy have knowingly harmed the vulnerable while preaching at the government the general public and their rapidly departing flock. They really can't see themselves, can they?

Back to safeguarding, as this is is a safeguarding complaint. On the grounds of this complaint, can the synods bowel movements not be reported on, as it is all fakery, not news and distressing to victims and an annoyance to the general public. Further to that, the release of the iicsa report will enduce huge slurry spatterings of lies and fake sorrow, repentance and 'lessons learned' even though the church have been asked to stop using that falsehood tired term. Lessons haven't been learned, ever, that is why the telegraph is still producing slurry from Welby when his resignation is 7 years overdue and his is guilty of abuses.

Lessons don't need to be learned while that corporation hides behind powerful lawyers and disaster management firms paid for from the money of innocent communicants, what would Jesus think?

In 2013 the Telegraph published one of Welby's first glory stunts, a fake apology to a victim alonside a whitewash report that covered up for wrongdoers at the expense of the  victim, the start of the false safeguarding game where Welby and Paul Butler tried to use church abuse as a kind of grotesque advert for the church, full of pride and arrogance and without understanding of the impact on victims.

The lengths to the mishandling of this case by Welby, Butler and others goes to extremes, because they have had the victim forcibly silenced to avoid justice for what amounts to criminal misconduct on their part. 

The telegraph published the whitewash and false apology as a press release for Welby but refused to respond to the victim as their publication destroyed her life. Paul Butler's press input on the whole matter was to claim to be 'praying for everyone involved' a lame and useless summary of his safeguarding training and experience, showing his unsuitability as he allowed the press and defendants to rip the vulnerable adult victim to shreds for years on end after the Telegraph article. The church provided no safety or representation for the victim.

Welby, Butler and all involved , ignored all correspondence from the victim as she screamed for help, they left her unprotected to basically be killed by their manufactured hatred against her and carried out further openly conflicted and malicious reports to protect all wrongdoers in the case, excluding and ignoring the victim's pleas for this to stop. Her story was excluded. They had relied on the victim, homeless because of their previous destruction of her, and very vulnerable, to have no voice or representation while they had plenty of biased and well paid representation, including Sarah Mullally's disaster management firm who they use whenever they go too far in their dangerous behavior.

It was a pure and open whitewash and no one, no authority, from the house of lords to the police will or would challenge the church of England, even when begged by the victim, indeed these bodies aid and abet such matters on behalf of the church routinely, even the two church abuse charities in England are run by the c of e for their protection and acted for them. 

A former police officer defended the victim against press led hatred and lies for three years until the stress of one onslaught caused his collapse. The victim was left to continue to be destroyed by the merciless church and press. Imagine, the church didn't envisage anyone defending the victim, she should have been disposed of more easily and less expensively.

Welby ended the investigation by apologizing publicly to the defendant just as he had to the victim at the beginning, no warning to the victim, not a murmur from the press on this and the other unexplained paradoxes similar to this throughout, because no one has investigated, the press aided Welby in this 'final' destruction aimed at causing the suicide of the victim. At the same time, the Bishop of Winchester tried to hide the injunction that the Victim had taken against him by discrediting the victim. 

The national safeguarding team and archbishops council were fully involved and the national safeguarding team actively tried to silence the victim while failing to act on the safeguarding failure, they even paid a psychologist to 'advise' them and thus anyone who contacted them about the travesty, to 'ignore' the victim. What a serious and illegal abuse, both the psychologist and the safeguarding team have yet to be arrested.

As the victim continued to ask for justice, the embarrassed church had her violently brutalized and imprisoned for 'harassment' despite what they did to her, leaving her homeless and seriously injured. As she remains, this victim who you published Welby's fake apology to.

Welby and Peter Hancock, the next fake safeguarding lead, made a big show in the press about employing the lead defendant under them despite his actions making him a safeguarding risk, the thing is, he never turned up, after a proud and showy resignation from his post. But the press never investigate these things. Hancock basically turned safeguarding into a joke with his part in the whitewash. 

Lord Faulkner, one of the church's unregulated cover up team recently highlighted his and others abuse of power in this case by a tirade in the press and lords in favour of the defendant, he praised the archbishop for his horrendous action in apologizing to the defendant, and still nothing is done. The leader of the Lords is afraid to act despite receiving multiple complaints as the church and their stooges ate dangerously unregulated.

The Bishop of London was contacted about this case in 2017 and actively refused to take action. She has had no credibility since then but like Welby, she goes on and on...and on and on. Is she also bankrolled by the oligarchy and their chosen figurehead when Welby can no longer be sustained in his madness?

The Telegraph investigation team have been asked but don't dare to challenge the oligarchy who are paying for Welby to destroy the church and interfere in Brexit, general elections etc, even though it is such very open corruption and they certainly don't want to investigate the Telegraph. But if the Telegraph want to persist in covering Welby's displays at the expense of victims they need to balance it with investigation into this.

The new safeguarding leads have received my complaint but like Paul Butler, they took their positions for acclaim and not with the intention of safeguarding. Like Butler and most in the c of e, safeguarding is another word for cover up and get paid for it, win-win. 

They have been unable to respond to the complaint at all, at one point one of them tried to refer me to an advisor connected with the archbishops council despite the fact that I am one of the official complaints against the archbishops council. And that is the c of e.

One of the safeguarding leads is a subordinate of the Bishop involved in the case mentioned above as well as being the third safeguarding bishop connected to that  diocese and case, and no improvement in diocese safeguarding has been made in decades, several safeguarding officials in a row in that diocese were involved in destroying the victim above through lies to the police to cause her wrongful violent arrest.

Jonathan Gibb, the main safeguarding lead is failing miserably because he treats safeguarding as Paul Butler did, as a game to play to the press. He is failing to address Welby's compromised position and the case mentioned. The situation is so dire that two clergy who attacked the victim in the case above in the media are involved with other victims bringing the case against the archbishops council.

Could the Telegraph please stop aiding abuse and publishing these compromised senior clergy?  They are unelected and their opinion is not news. They are failed ministers of religion and their sponsors use them in their unregulated positions to interfere in whatever they have an interest in, meanwhile the actual  church has collapsed, causing huge hurt to the elderly congregation. 

A solution would be for the oligarchy to separate the archbishop and his senior clergy and council from the church as a kind of political party without an interest in human wellbeing and let annual moderators be selected by the people to run the church. The Pharisees tried to make Church about politics and Jesus said it wasn't what He required. The archbishop has set himself up against Jesus and Christians as thousands of abandoned flock mention when the church abuses the press.

The church of England as a cult of less than 800,000 isn't really camouflage for the wickedness and corruption of its leaders any more. Other cults with dying congregation and closed buildings aren't allowed to preen in the spotlight so these rich spoilt guilty old nuisances shouldn't either.

Finally, Welby has pulled some nauseating stunts in his time, his ego must have a house of its own, but one of his worst was his safeguarding failure of the vanity shot where he faked helping on coronavirus wards in order to gain glory for himself, he breached lockdown while refusing to let his clergy offer spiritual support to congregation, he conveniently forgot his previous claim of pneumonia for his ghoulish act, the nhs failed to act on it and on his history of safeguarding failure, pneumonia and mental illness, and then his personal assistant nearly died of coronavirus and refuses to return to work. 

Further information on the matter is available on my blog johniancarter.blogspot.com 

Also see 'Surviving Church' written by a retired clergyman.

Now the process for silencing the victims is to make them out to be insane, I await the same treatment, from an archbishop who has tried to glorify himself over mental health and curry pity for himself by announcing his illness  at the same time as he and his council have branded victims as insane.

Report on some of this, Telegraph. And you and the church need to start reading and keeping in mind the comments from your readers on the church's vanity displays. We don't need a month of slurry splattering from the failed and dying church.f

regards,

John Carter

Bishops and Exam Results

 Dear Bishops,

It was hoped that you had learned something from the embarrassing spectacle of the C of E's interference in the Dominic Cummings matter. Remember how the Bishops are being punished for that dangerous offer to withdraw from interfering in government which the club who run the C of E of course hadn't agreed to? You had to do false death threats to take the public's mind off that hopeful promise.

The Church of England are a really funny little cult, trying to use news articles in order to recruit or gain favour, but it isn't pleasant to watch fake sentiments and crawling by the Bishops while safeguarding and treatment of abuse victims in the C of E is still a very serious issue, please leave the young people who have been caught up in the exams mess alone, they are potentially vulnerable to be preyed on, and preying is the C of E's speciality, but it is so open and so shameless and it is very unlikely indeed that you will recruit from those young adults, they have done A-levels, they aren't stupid or uninformed. 

The way Bishops try to latch onto headlines to try to get spotlight for themselves leaves a sick feeling in the stomach, that desperation for relevance, that effort to gain attention, that narcissism that doesn't take in their irrelevance and arrogance, that attempt to use vulnerable groups in the news to try to recruit for the dying cult, it's so blatant, so needy. 

Safeguarding should be first, attention seeking later. A number of Bishops still need to be removed for their harm to victims, as well as the Archbishops and their council. The current situation remains that Bishops are unable to respond well to complaints, and the new 'safeguarding Bishops' have to be forced to get an answer to letters from victims and concerned members of the public, if they answer at all, no change from the previous 'safeguarding Bishops'. But Jonathan Gibb had time to go on BBC 4 to reassure the elderly and naive who make donations and leave legacies to the C of E, that all is well in the world. Where will the Church of England be without their BBC 4 propaganda machine? 

Leave those poor students alone you silly Bishops, neither they nor any other group in the news spotlight want you fawning all over them.

John Carter