The House of Bishops support Assisted Dying

This is today's letter. Not perfect as I am voice typing now, excuse the errors.

22/10/2021 

Dear charity commission,

Formal Complaint. Part 1 of 4.

 I'm sorry to have to write this but I feel that your negligence has caused deaths and will cause more deaths unless you stop deferring to, and protecting the Church of England. Hundreds of complaints but you fail to act, at the same time as you advertise having punished smaller religious charities frequently.

Today, is often the case, the nation are being subjected to an unwelcome peacock play by the Archbishop of Canterbury. One of the subjects that he's using, along with his Bishops, is the Assisted Dying Bill.

As you know, the Church of England are

In favour of assisted dying. you recently received a coroner's report to that effect, a report stating that the Church of England are responsible for the death of a priest and that more are likely, past deaths are not known to the coroner but they are to us. this report from the coroner was sent to yourselves and the Archbishop. Basically the Church of England killed that priest for being gay. unfortunately that priest was far from the only person murdered by the Church of England.

 I feel that if you had acted on the many complaints made about the Church of England, that priest and others might not have died. I feel that the charity commission are responsible for very great suffering and harm to many because they refuse to stand up to the Church of England. if the charity commission was acting responsibly, Justin Welby who is personally responsible for harm to many would not be in the Press yet again and showing off and harming over again, those he's already harmed, he would be gone.

The charity commission indicate by their lack of action that they condone the bad behaviour of the Church of England. it is known that the charity commission are conflicted, an abuse victim pointed out several years ago that an official in the diocese of Bath and Wells was using his charity commission email address as the diocesan email address an open conflict of interests. in light of this, the charity commission should have appointed an independent body to investigate and discipline the Church of England and look at how members conflicted by a foot in both camps have influenced complaints. 

It is virtually impossible for anyone wronged by the Church of England to find independent help or support, the Church of England are allowed to conflict every authority and body in the UK. the charity commission are Duty bound to make sure that investigators who are truly independent are elected. If the charity commission continue to ignore the situation and fail to take action against the Church of England despite the charity commissions failures leading to the recent preventable death of father Griffin, they are liable for deaths and harm. 

The charity commission been made aware of dangerous corrupt and abusive behaviour by the Church of England, and with this behaviour widely evidenced, for years. no action of any worth has been taken. no tangible action or change has been seen. William Nye, has been boasting in Church of England speak at the synods, that the Church of England lawyers have satisfactorily driven the charity commission away. 

While the charity commission lack the courage and integrity to stand up to the Church of England, they are committing a serious safeguarding and regulatory failure. while the charity commission are conflicted by their members being members of Church of England, diocese or synod, and failing to declare that as they failed to bring the Church of England to account, the charity commission are putting lives at risk. 

William Nye is well known as a gatekeeper who has taken part in cover-ups that have harmed abuse victims. While the charity commission to fail to act to prevent William Nye's position to harm abuse victims, the charity commission are failing in their duty of care. The Church of England's way of operating is deceit. the complaint brought against the archbishops Council to the charity commission by abuse victims, was met with another display of deceit, the archbishops Council, in a prearranged PR stunt, they pretended to unanimously to support abuse victims. The the Church of England's twisted mirror game where they say the opposite of what they do is well-known, and as what they do in this respect goes against Christianity, they are operating as a charity under false pretences. 

The Church of England are essentially a business operating under the guise of a charity. a charity doesn't need to rely on lawyers every day to protect themselves from safeguarding complaints and abuse complaints, if a charity did that, the charity should not be operating. a charity doesn't need conflicted insurers protecting them from abuse victims, if they do they shouldn't be operating. a charity should not destroy vulnerable people and then spend today boasting about themselves in the Press, if they do, the charity commission should close them down. A charity responsible for Taking Lives, should be closed down not be interfering in politics and public affairs making a nuisance of themselves to the general public. You would normally hold a charity accountable for a death, wouldn't you? 

Justin welby's interference in the last general election should have lead to action by the charity commission, the Church of England not a political party nor a political activist group, they run under the guise of being a Christian charity organisation, Justin Welby's smears of the Labour Party at the last general election were a breach of charity guidelines. if the Church of England are not going to be regulated by the charity commission then they should not keep charitable status. Justin Welby best known for publicly attacking his family as well as aiding and abetting public defamation of other people, as the head of a Christian charity appears to have no understanding of the Foundation of Christianity and appears to have not heard of the Ten Commandments, which are an important part of the faith. 

Considering the serious mess that the Church of England are in, they shouldn't really be attending the House of Lords or taking part in any debate as if their views were responsible or balanced. no other charity is allowed to infiltrate the House of Lords and interfere in debates with a biased view. this is a formal complaint and I should be professional about this complaint, but I'm not saying what I'm saying the viewpoint of someone who supports assisted dying, I'm saying it from the viewpoint of someone who is looking on at the corrupt and unregulated Church of England interfering in matters that considering their own state, they're not in a position to judge on. the Church of England need be accountable, regulated and under the rule of law before they have any credibility in any matter of public debate. 

The case of Father Griffin, as I've said, from an isolated case, Martyn Percy, hounded beyond endurance, and still the charity commission haven't acted effectively. The  diocese involved in that case, are guilty of exceptional harm to abuse victims in other cases. the charity commission are aware and have been contacted about the Martyn Percy case, but instead of stepping in as the charity commission should in such serious behaviour by a charity, they have allowed the Martyn Percy case to continue and escalate, and it's obviously no matter what Percy is guilty of or not,  this treatment of him breaches human rights law, if he's not been charged then the Church of England needed private and effective resolution not a public horror display. But the charity commission have failed to act. Again, in Lincoln such cases have pushed people to the edge of suicide but one Lincoln abuser was enabled to go on abusing and never brought to justice. The  charity commission have not acted. no ruling on the behaviour of the Church of England been made or published. what we here is the vague ' the charity commission are investigating'. which as the years go on is not satisfactory, what it indicates is charity commission are either complicit, or afraid to act. 

In the meantime, while the the archbishops and Bishops continue loud and very fake noise about safeguarding, and hold up various women as safeguarding PR puppets - anyone the archbishops are proud to announce are either unaware or complicit - Melissa Caslake fled after 18 months while Jane Chevous harms abuse victims by broadcasting fake safeguarding and trying to direct people to the criminal national safeguarding team, we see routine breaches of safeguarding such as the Archbishop claiming to be ministering to people on covid wards - is the Archbishop employed by the NHS, is he CRB checked by the NHS? this is a man who has been evidenced to deliberately harm abuse victims, this is a man who claimed to have pneumonia, why when his church as such a serious state, that clergy and abuse victims are being driven to death, is this man walking around covid wards for the sake of a PR stunt and his bottomless well of vanity, when when he's not do so and is not taking responsibility for his serious misconduct, dereliction of Duty with regards his church and the vulnerable people, and is not listening to the general public when they asked him to stop abusing the Press for his own personal limelight. 

Unfortunately the bishop's and Deans of the Church of England are no better and take every opportunity to show off, one and all are guilty of safeguarding failure and arrogant with it. The general public are not interested in the clergy's cats posed in videos and on social media for silly press releases and attention seeking. The c of e should face a press ban inaction is taken against them. 

Unacceptable behaviour of the bishop's includes shows of going to help at old people's home, immediately the humble so called work is released to the press, but no one asks were these men cleared by police checks to go to the old people's home and act as if they work there? They then go home to their palaces while the minimum wage carers return to their disrupted work, these men, these Bishops were involved in a serious safeguarding failure that the charity commission are aware of and have been aware of for years but have failed to address. it appears that the charity commission condone all the serious misconduct of the Church of England and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. 

Keep in mind every time the leaders of the Church of England show off publicly, the victims who they have harmed and silenced and families of those who have died as a result, are made to suffer again, as they are doing today in Welby and his gang interfering in the assisted dying bill and showing off about the environment. The leaders of the Church of England with their palaces to heat and their flash cars, their wealth and their servants and estate and everything that they use, are not in any position try to preach about the environment or claim to set an example. 

The Church of England, in their current state, have no place in Society. They can't set an example in any subject, if and when they do try they are seen as hypocrites. They incessantly voice their views in the Press, where other charities are ignored or turned away for press releases. the Church of England are relevant for worship to less than 2% of the population, their safeguarding record is atrocious, what is known of it, because of course they forcibly silence many many people. They cannot tell the people or England or further afield how to live because they don't set an example. 

The use of non-disclosure orders the headlines several years ago, when a woman in Birmingham was silenced over abuse by a vicar. More recently when the use of non-disclosure orders in the Church of England made headline, the Archbishop of Canterbury denied all knowledge of it, even though he couldn't have not known about the Birmingham headline and the very serious case where Justin Welby himself was involved in silencing a victim. Can the head of a charity really be credible if he claims not to know about the corrupt practices within his charity, even though it's not possible for him not to have known? the big question in conclusion is, the charity commission know all of this, why are they refusing to act? 

And of course, just part of a bigger picture so big but I can't possibly cover it in a four part complaint. In light of this, and the fact that this spanning decades almost without limit, wouldn't it be a good idea for the charity commission to suspend and restrict the Church of England's access to vulnerable groups, care home settings, charities, outreach services, schools, and all organisations which the Church of England feed off and used for PR in order to justify their existence, until proper systemic investigation and discipline Church of England has been carried out? It makes no sense to let a racist, misogynistic, ableist abusive charity like the church of England to continue when you would close any other charity for the same offences. 

If you continue to fail to act. You will be responsible for further deaths. The coroner in the Griffin case showed immense courage in refusing to bow to Church of England interference and highlighting the interference. Socialite Bishop Sarah Mullaly is used to showing off about being able to conflict every authority, as mentioned to you by an abuse victim previously, she must have got the shock of her life to be stood up to by a non-freemason, non-Anglican with no partiality for the Church of England at all.

 The Church emergency action will to make sure one of their own coroners is in place next time. The coroners report was sent to you - you won't act on it, and it was sent to Welby so he could drivel crocodile tears all over the general public and wipe his snotty nose all over them. The coroner acted in good faith and did a stunning job of being one of the first officials ever to impartially and objectively shame the Church of England and highlight their interference in her work. No one dares, so rapes and deaths will continue in the c of e until you do your job. 

How many deaths will it take to force you to regulate the Church? Why did you look on while our friend was driven to death when you were made amply aware of the serious and dangerous criminal misconduct in the c of e? You let them deliberately harm someone. 

In the recent Janner report published by the iicsa who also protected the Church of England, it was claimed that the victims were disbelieved because of their status and the poor old police didn't have a vested interest in protecting Janner. All of these  public abuse reports defer to the police and don't make them accountable. The UK police are as unaccountable as the Church of England and work closely to shield the Church and their crimes, but members of the public as well as children in care reported Janner and met with deliberate obstruction. As a result, Janner died having had a good life, while his victims suffered and saw him showing off as the benevolent public figure with all the PR as Welby and friends do, Jimmy Savile also comes to mind, some victims died as a result. You and Justin Welby are the police and Janner all over again, it's not disbelief, it's deliberate protection and it is s leading to suffering and death. 

As a result of the above statement, I will publish and share this first part of the complaint, as deaths and resulting loss of records back before emails and Internet protected Janner but as the Church of England situation continues, I want a public record of what I have written and I'm not obliged to fulfil any requirements in order for you to action my complaint. I am one of the many complainants who you have failed and refused, our perished friend is another, and its time for an external record for a future public inquiry.

If you want my address and that gets into the hands of the Church of England, we will be at risk as our friend was while you looked on because the Church of England kill, with the help of their conflicted local authorities. You don't need an address in order to action such a serious evidenced formal complaint. Each day that passes is a day with lives at risk. Wake up and act. 

Before I go, can you force the Church of England to rip up the PR speech that whines about 'brave' victims, every time the Church of England paedophile are actually caught. Its an insult, especially after the first 5 hundred repeats. 

John Carter (&friends and family). 

A letter in frustration

 Dear Church House,

Lambeth Palace has quite a big problem with receiving and responding to concerns, so I'm sending this concern to you.

I'm sure that you're aware of the recent two-week advertising campaign by Justin Welby, which started before Easter, just after the news that the victims of Fletcher and Smyth, close associates of Justin Welby, were yet again denied justice as a result of redacted reports and refusal by senior leaders to resign over their part in the cover-ups.

As well as appearing totally insensitive to the distress that he causes victims when he does his advertising campaigns, Justin Welby appears out of touch with his own distressed church and without proper modulation or instruction on what he releases into the media. Both Justin Welby and Lambeth Palace seem unable to process the responses to the advertising campaigns, which is going to prevent his recent aim, stated in the financial times, of making the church more appealing to the secular world.

As things currently stand, the only group he is making the church attractive to is paedophiles. Because the widespread anguish of victims in response to Justin Welby's advertising campaigns, and the way that Lambeth Palace ignore these victims and everyone who gives feedback and complaints on the back of Mr Welby's advertising, indicates that the Church of England will remain a closed fortress, the only victims with a voice in the press in answer to Mr Welby are the Smyth victims, who have enough money and power behind them to be successful in being heard. The secular world are not going to find an archaic closed fortress attractive unless they want to be able to abuse people and power and be protected, for that is what the church of England have a reputation for; well, that and being ridiculous and out of touch.

Mr Welby's advertising campaign was launched immediately as the victims of Fletcher were left in shock, very callous and inappropriate, victims were crying in shock and anger. The failed safeguarding Bishop, Paul Butler, whose misconducts are many, still hasn't resigned or been suspended, Justin Welby and the church of England's usual response to being exposed for misconduct is the advertising campaign and this recent one has been a bumper one, leaving victims reeling. Some of his most stomach-churning vanity advertising has been seen during the pandemic while the congregation of the C of E have been left in confusion, Mr Welby makes headlines by 'secretly' causing a safeguarding and health risk interfering on covid 19 wards when he claimed to have had pneumonia and isn't medically qualified, he made minds boggle when he showed off his kitchen as an advertising stunt, and then this recent vanity run, he posed holding a phone and pretended to be on the phone to the Queen.

Apparently the Queen told him to talk to the press about Prince Harry's wedding, which isn't appropriate. And presumably she told him that the Duke of Edinburgh was about to die. But did she tell him to say that being in the Royal Family was a life sentence without parole, immediately before the Duke of Edinburgh died? It is widely wondered if Mr Welby's communications team deliberately set him up for these unpleasant gaffes as they happen so frequently. But more of us think that what happens is, Mr Welby has a relief carer who doesn't make him take his medication and he goes out of control until his normal carer returns.
His Easter messages were just scripted tripe, irrelevant to anyone and could have been trotted out by any politician. The Archbishop of Wales' message of hope was more respected, Welby just kept muttering about 'A better future for all'. Which is typical of what his script writers turn out, irrelevant.

If Mr Welby wants the church to be more relevant to the secular world, he needs to stop tearing his church apart, restore respect and dignity to those who work to uphold it, stop the vanity advertising, stop ignoring the general public who contact Lambeth Palace or give feedback on news articles, stop ignoring abuse victims, and take responsibility.

A failing and very troubled organization with unsuitable Archbishops isn't attractive to the general public - secular or Christian, and hundreds of Christians who have given a lot of time to the church of England have had to leave because of Mr Welby. Does he really expect to replace those people with non-Christians? Does he really not understand what he is saying? Sometimes you have to wonder if he is fully lucid. He doesn't have the general public's support because his behaviour and words are not okay. Whoever writes the joke scripts finds the pettiest of cliches and Mr Welby appears to think that he will gain the general public's favour by trotting these out rather than being a Christian role model. 'Cancel Culture'. Pitiful to see a man who is supposed to be the leader of the Christian church trotting out such cliched non-expressions. The church of england has fallen hard.

'Cancel Culture'. Mr Welby has destroyed abuse victims in cover-ups, he has cancelled lives, most notably the disabled female victim who he and his safeguarding team publicly assassinated, and who he and his safeguarding team are still not prepared to redeem. Mr Welby committed open and criminal misconduct in that case in conjunction with peers, judges, Lords, Politicians and authorities, and that isn't an isolated case. Mr Welby should be looking at 'Cover up Culture' and his own misconduct. The fact that he and senior leaders involved in the misconducts of that case and others are still not stepping down, says more than any vanity advertising run. It is a daily abuse to the victims of Mr Welby and the senior leaders to have to endure seeing these men in the press and media with advertising and meaningless ramblings.

Of course there is plenty of feedback to the C of E advertising campaigns. But as I said, it is ignored by the church. At the moment there is a petition against an abusive clergyman being reinstated, which will be ignored by the church. There are victims crying out in anger on social media. There are articles in the smaller media. For example a very astute article picking apart Mr Welby and the Bishop of Dover's cruel and bullying accusations against their own congregation of racism. You cannot simply accuse people en masse of racism without any grounds, it is a very nasty and unjust thing to do. And then there's the more recent article by Linda Woodhead, an extract below which made me think of you.

'It explains why those who try to blow the whistle are ignored or traduced, and why bad news has to be hushed up. It explains why so many large and costly ‘comms’ teams are employed by dioceses, Church House and Lambeth to pump out good news and bury bad. It explains why truthfulness is not a value you ever hear preached. This all makes sense because there is institutional grandiosity to defend, and an ‘it’ to be denied'.

That out of touch and narcissistic advertising campaign by the archbishop, followed by all criticism or concerns being ignored, will be the death of the church of england, and all the money in the world, all the power to corrupt government and Lords, authorities and press, won't save the C of E. Each time letters, emails, phonecalls, feedback on press articles and articles criticizing the church are ignored, or those who speak up are attacked or made out to be mad, it is another nail in the church of england's coffin, and it beggars belief that Mr Welby can talk about making the church more attractive to the secular world when he is destroying it for Christians and for all.

All the money being wasted on a very poor PR representation of the C of E, easily seen through and an imposition on the general public, could be being used to reform the church of england, and to implement safeguarding, because as long as the Bishops of Manchester, Bristol and Southampton and the NST continue to ignore the safeguarding complaint made against Justin Welby and other senior leaders, a serious and amply evidenced matter, as long as it remains that Justin Welby does his vanity advertising while he knows he's guilty of manslaughter through his actions, and nothing is done about that serious matter, there is no safeguarding, no prospect of the church of england being attractive to anyone, and no future for the church of england.

Links:  https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/inside-the-minds-of-church-sex-abusers/

            https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/white-anglican-and-cancelled/

            https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-dare-cofe-leaders-imply-our-pews-are-filled-with-racists/

A letter to the House of Lords

 Dear House of Lords, 

This is a serious formal complaint.

Several weeks ago, the IICSA report on the Church of England was published. 

The Church of England's response was pitiful. Following the advice of their disaster management firm, Luther-Pendragon, the Archbishops released a 'joint' 'apology' BEFORE the release of the report, making a mockery of the report and the victims. 

The release of the report led to victims being further harmed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and Bishop of Manchester carrying out glib and misleading interviews about safeguarding, when both men are guilty of cover-up and harming abuse victims and neither are able to respond well to victims. Indeed the Bishop of Manchester is still unable to respond to my safeguarding complaint and as for Justin Welby, hubris is his middle name, he is guilty of serious harm to abuse victims by his active part in cover-ups.

The Church of England's disaster management firm have decided that once the IICSA report was firmly sat upon with all the fake weeping and wailing and characteristic fake sorrow that Welby and his church are known best for and which enrages victims, it is time for business as usual the Church of England way. Find out what public feeling is and try to use it to curry favour for the Church of England. At the expense of all the victims left distressed by the Church of England's response to the IICSA report.

So this week the Church finds everything they can to try to gain favour. John Sentamu, who covered up for abusers and rapists and denied their victims, is carrying out an unchristian act of demanding a seat in the House of Lords and trying to play the race card. His harm to abuse victims should make him so ashamed of himself that he should be keeping his mouth firmly shut, but the Church of England is all about self-glory, and so the ignorant are standing up and wailing about racism, and victims who correct them and mention Sentamu's history of unpunished misconduct are attacked, me included.

But this week's terrible behaviour by the church seems to know no bounds, anything they can virtue signal about, they are virtue signalling about.

Brexit is none of the Church of England's business, their interference is inappropriate, I understand that Welby was removed from his interference in Brexit position, quite rightly because of his insane behaviour, but his sponsors, whether they are from Russia or the UAE or even just his fellow peers, wouldn't have been too happy. Welby's behaviour and interferences in politics indicate that his behaviour is sponsored by someone or some people who want specific outcomes and can pay an old oil baron millionaire enough or is he being blackmailed over his African adventures? And as that has been consistent, I think it should be looked into.

Luther-Pendragon are presumably the ones who look at public feeling and try to gain glory for the Church of England by making them play on public feeling. The Church of England is irrelevant and hated in England, and is of worth for worship to less than 2% of the population, including children being forced to worship because their is no choice of a secular school. The strategy is, to use the culpable, guilty, abuser-protecting Bishops and Archbishops to try to gain admiration and sympathy for the Church of England. Anyone who supports Brexit is more likely to say 'Oh, the good old abuser-protecting hypocritical Bishops and Archbishops, standing up for our rights' when they interfere in Brexit and make a huge shameless show of it to the media who are determined to go on re-abusing the victims of these men publicly and making the victims endure these awful PR shows. 

The same goes for Sentamu and his unchristian desire for a seat of power after a career protecting rapists and harming victims. He wants the general public to pick up his cry of 'racism' when who knows, maybe the government are aware of his horrendous harm to abuse victims, and while they haven't yet removed the rest of the abuser-protectors from the House of Lords, Rowan Williams has removed himself, apparently, and presumably the current Archbishops can be asked to be quiet, have some humility and do the same and take their interfering unelected and undeserved Lords Bishops with them. Because right now, no matter how much victims are attacked by remainers for saying that Brexit is none of the Bishops' business and they have more important things to do such as deal with their continued obstruction to abuse victims and resign, those Bishops, by being in the House of Lords, are effectively being rewarded richly for abuse and misconduct, while their actions are triggering further harm to victims.

The Lords Speaker and Standards have received a number of serious complaints as the Church of England are not properly regulated or held to account elsewhere and are able to use the Lords and Parliament for their own protection when their corrupt and abusive actions should lead to them being prosecuted, charged or otherwise held to account. The Church of England, irrelevant to the UK population and currently consisting of a monster backbone of unaccountable power and a load of failing parish churches, is a body that cannot go on as it does, abusing the general public with their interferences that are eagerly helped along by the terrible UK press, while they have no safeguarding or accountability in place. The IICSA report was a farce that failed to hold them to account and enabled them to do as they do, use abuse as  PR game full of falsehoods and move on, and it is the closest the Anglican Church have ever come to being held to account, and now it is business as usual, using public opinion to curry favour while victims suffer.

The Lords Speaker and Standards are failing to act upon complaints, which makes them guilty of enabling this harm to continue.

Sentamu has no right whatsoever to demand a seat in the House of Lords, and his colleagues should not be behaving as they are in the press, they should be resigning and leaving. 

Stephen Cotterell is not a suitable Archbishop, his misconducts would have prevented him from applying for promotion in a normal decent organization, but he was chosen by Welby because he behaves as Welby does, all PR and show, happy to cover up abuse and harm victims, and to be Welby's nodding dog, always co-signing these men's silly virtue signalling letters to the press, every letter is currently treated as if it was a once-in-a-lifetime event by the press who announce it, presumably this is another Luther Pendragon trick but it is getting ridiculous.

 The situation remains that anyone contacting the Archbishops or Bishops, including David Walker and Jonathan Gibbs, will be studiously ignored, or even blocked, and persistent calls for action and change are treated as 'pestering' or harassment or insanity, as if Victims and the general publichad no right to criticize or call for justice and change, even since the IICSA report. So The virtue signalling, PR stunting, silly Archbishops and Bishops in the house of Lords need to change their priority and instead of the vain efforts to run to the front of wherever the nation is leading to crawl for favour from the nation, they need to address the way they treat the general public and their victims. Living in fortresses and ignoring correspondence doesn't fit well with trying to use current affairs to gain popularity. 

I write this as someone who is against Brexit and the internal market bill, and I write it knowing what Welby and his church are, which not all the general public do, so I and other victims of the church of all kinds, are being attacked by those who the church have managed to mislead over their virtue signalling pretences to gain acclaim over the Brexit situation, because we speak out and say that these guilty senior clergy have other priorities rather than using the general public's feeling to gain favour. This situation should not be happening. A church which reaches only 2% of the population through worship, including the children who they force worship upon, doesn't have any place at all in the Lords, especially when they are simply doing a recovery PR run after the IICSA report which they have basically spat on. Business as usual, the Church of England way, and if the Lords do not address this, they should as a whole be brought into question, especially the Speaker who has been well aware of Justin Welby and John Sentamu's personal serious misconducts for some years. 

This matter is a safeguarding failure, it is an operational failure, it is a systemic misconduct. The House of Lords and the Press should start an inquiry into the impacts of their support of the failed and abusive church of england and their behaviour. The press of the UK are profoundly abusive and subversive and their constant support of the church of england's behaviour as well as their other misleading non-news, should be the subject of an inquiry, their failure to give the church's victims an equal voice and their persistent ignoring of complaints even when their PR articles for the church rack up thousands of negative online comments means that it is time for a new inquiry, a new stage of the Leveson Inquiry perhaps? Newspapers should be for news, not for vain nobodies who have a cult relevant to less than 2% of England to show off that they have undeserved and unearned places in Lords and government and can interfere in any matter that is nothing to do with their 2% cult to suit them while their victims, more than 2% of the population over the decades! Are made to suffer and be re-abused. The Church of England's behaviour in the recent destruction of the UK over this 'virus' should have been their last word, they are of no use to the UK and are being allowed to continue to harm their victims while the Lords are aware of this.

The church of england can choose to have a vested interest in anything that gains them money, power or favour, unregulated and without concern for those who they harm, despite their reach of only 2% of the population through worship, and we didn't elect them, so this must be brought to an end. one could say this is their desperate attempt to avoid being kicked out of the Lords as part of the reform, the general public who they despise can be duped into being on their side. No other Lords abuse the press as much.

There are concerns that the church are trying to build their dying congregation by forcing recruitment in the schools that they still have power over despite their systemic abuses of children, no one should be pressured into a cult that can't safeguard, this situation is so unreal, it simply wouldn't happen in any other modern country, and certain Lords reply to criticism by boasting about the church's 'humble good works', secular organizations do more good work, the gap would close if the abusive church was disposed of, and we wouldn't have the secular organizations boasting all the time in the press or using 'missions' to abuse vulnerable children, one would hope.

I speak for all victims. Sentamu has no right to the Lords, whatever colour, neither do his colleagues, whatever colour. Peerages for abuse is as corrupt as this country gets. Enough is enough. If the press cannot grant the victims they have harmed justice and a voice, they should not be granting the oppressors a voice. Trolls calling me racist, I have no reason to be, abuse caused by anyone of any colour should be punished, and John Sentamu isn't above punishment, I am Jewish and Justin Welby's bipolar attack that led to him making Jesus out to be any race but Jewish came across as antisemitic. But the press didn't report that, only the church's side, not the general public's.

The Church of England have failed to respond to this letter, so have the press. They need to deal with correspondence and be competent in that before any more national press advertising campaigns:

https://johniancarter.blogspot.com/2020/10/letter-to-press-and-bishops-on-anglican.html

In the meantime, victims wait in silence and suffer these insufferable men.

Sincerely, 

Mr John Carter