The House of Bishops support Assisted Dying

This is today's letter. Not perfect as I am voice typing now, excuse the errors.

22/10/2021 

Dear charity commission,

Formal Complaint. Part 1 of 4.

 I'm sorry to have to write this but I feel that your negligence has caused deaths and will cause more deaths unless you stop deferring to, and protecting the Church of England. Hundreds of complaints but you fail to act, at the same time as you advertise having punished smaller religious charities frequently.

Today, is often the case, the nation are being subjected to an unwelcome peacock play by the Archbishop of Canterbury. One of the subjects that he's using, along with his Bishops, is the Assisted Dying Bill.

As you know, the Church of England are

In favour of assisted dying. you recently received a coroner's report to that effect, a report stating that the Church of England are responsible for the death of a priest and that more are likely, past deaths are not known to the coroner but they are to us. this report from the coroner was sent to yourselves and the Archbishop. Basically the Church of England killed that priest for being gay. unfortunately that priest was far from the only person murdered by the Church of England.

 I feel that if you had acted on the many complaints made about the Church of England, that priest and others might not have died. I feel that the charity commission are responsible for very great suffering and harm to many because they refuse to stand up to the Church of England. if the charity commission was acting responsibly, Justin Welby who is personally responsible for harm to many would not be in the Press yet again and showing off and harming over again, those he's already harmed, he would be gone.

The charity commission indicate by their lack of action that they condone the bad behaviour of the Church of England. it is known that the charity commission are conflicted, an abuse victim pointed out several years ago that an official in the diocese of Bath and Wells was using his charity commission email address as the diocesan email address an open conflict of interests. in light of this, the charity commission should have appointed an independent body to investigate and discipline the Church of England and look at how members conflicted by a foot in both camps have influenced complaints. 

It is virtually impossible for anyone wronged by the Church of England to find independent help or support, the Church of England are allowed to conflict every authority and body in the UK. the charity commission are Duty bound to make sure that investigators who are truly independent are elected. If the charity commission continue to ignore the situation and fail to take action against the Church of England despite the charity commissions failures leading to the recent preventable death of father Griffin, they are liable for deaths and harm. 

The charity commission been made aware of dangerous corrupt and abusive behaviour by the Church of England, and with this behaviour widely evidenced, for years. no action of any worth has been taken. no tangible action or change has been seen. William Nye, has been boasting in Church of England speak at the synods, that the Church of England lawyers have satisfactorily driven the charity commission away. 

While the charity commission lack the courage and integrity to stand up to the Church of England, they are committing a serious safeguarding and regulatory failure. while the charity commission are conflicted by their members being members of Church of England, diocese or synod, and failing to declare that as they failed to bring the Church of England to account, the charity commission are putting lives at risk. 

William Nye is well known as a gatekeeper who has taken part in cover-ups that have harmed abuse victims. While the charity commission to fail to act to prevent William Nye's position to harm abuse victims, the charity commission are failing in their duty of care. The Church of England's way of operating is deceit. the complaint brought against the archbishops Council to the charity commission by abuse victims, was met with another display of deceit, the archbishops Council, in a prearranged PR stunt, they pretended to unanimously to support abuse victims. The the Church of England's twisted mirror game where they say the opposite of what they do is well-known, and as what they do in this respect goes against Christianity, they are operating as a charity under false pretences. 

The Church of England are essentially a business operating under the guise of a charity. a charity doesn't need to rely on lawyers every day to protect themselves from safeguarding complaints and abuse complaints, if a charity did that, the charity should not be operating. a charity doesn't need conflicted insurers protecting them from abuse victims, if they do they shouldn't be operating. a charity should not destroy vulnerable people and then spend today boasting about themselves in the Press, if they do, the charity commission should close them down. A charity responsible for Taking Lives, should be closed down not be interfering in politics and public affairs making a nuisance of themselves to the general public. You would normally hold a charity accountable for a death, wouldn't you? 

Justin welby's interference in the last general election should have lead to action by the charity commission, the Church of England not a political party nor a political activist group, they run under the guise of being a Christian charity organisation, Justin Welby's smears of the Labour Party at the last general election were a breach of charity guidelines. if the Church of England are not going to be regulated by the charity commission then they should not keep charitable status. Justin Welby best known for publicly attacking his family as well as aiding and abetting public defamation of other people, as the head of a Christian charity appears to have no understanding of the Foundation of Christianity and appears to have not heard of the Ten Commandments, which are an important part of the faith. 

Considering the serious mess that the Church of England are in, they shouldn't really be attending the House of Lords or taking part in any debate as if their views were responsible or balanced. no other charity is allowed to infiltrate the House of Lords and interfere in debates with a biased view. this is a formal complaint and I should be professional about this complaint, but I'm not saying what I'm saying the viewpoint of someone who supports assisted dying, I'm saying it from the viewpoint of someone who is looking on at the corrupt and unregulated Church of England interfering in matters that considering their own state, they're not in a position to judge on. the Church of England need be accountable, regulated and under the rule of law before they have any credibility in any matter of public debate. 

The case of Father Griffin, as I've said, from an isolated case, Martyn Percy, hounded beyond endurance, and still the charity commission haven't acted effectively. The  diocese involved in that case, are guilty of exceptional harm to abuse victims in other cases. the charity commission are aware and have been contacted about the Martyn Percy case, but instead of stepping in as the charity commission should in such serious behaviour by a charity, they have allowed the Martyn Percy case to continue and escalate, and it's obviously no matter what Percy is guilty of or not,  this treatment of him breaches human rights law, if he's not been charged then the Church of England needed private and effective resolution not a public horror display. But the charity commission have failed to act. Again, in Lincoln such cases have pushed people to the edge of suicide but one Lincoln abuser was enabled to go on abusing and never brought to justice. The  charity commission have not acted. no ruling on the behaviour of the Church of England been made or published. what we here is the vague ' the charity commission are investigating'. which as the years go on is not satisfactory, what it indicates is charity commission are either complicit, or afraid to act. 

In the meantime, while the the archbishops and Bishops continue loud and very fake noise about safeguarding, and hold up various women as safeguarding PR puppets - anyone the archbishops are proud to announce are either unaware or complicit - Melissa Caslake fled after 18 months while Jane Chevous harms abuse victims by broadcasting fake safeguarding and trying to direct people to the criminal national safeguarding team, we see routine breaches of safeguarding such as the Archbishop claiming to be ministering to people on covid wards - is the Archbishop employed by the NHS, is he CRB checked by the NHS? this is a man who has been evidenced to deliberately harm abuse victims, this is a man who claimed to have pneumonia, why when his church as such a serious state, that clergy and abuse victims are being driven to death, is this man walking around covid wards for the sake of a PR stunt and his bottomless well of vanity, when when he's not do so and is not taking responsibility for his serious misconduct, dereliction of Duty with regards his church and the vulnerable people, and is not listening to the general public when they asked him to stop abusing the Press for his own personal limelight. 

Unfortunately the bishop's and Deans of the Church of England are no better and take every opportunity to show off, one and all are guilty of safeguarding failure and arrogant with it. The general public are not interested in the clergy's cats posed in videos and on social media for silly press releases and attention seeking. The c of e should face a press ban inaction is taken against them. 

Unacceptable behaviour of the bishop's includes shows of going to help at old people's home, immediately the humble so called work is released to the press, but no one asks were these men cleared by police checks to go to the old people's home and act as if they work there? They then go home to their palaces while the minimum wage carers return to their disrupted work, these men, these Bishops were involved in a serious safeguarding failure that the charity commission are aware of and have been aware of for years but have failed to address. it appears that the charity commission condone all the serious misconduct of the Church of England and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. 

Keep in mind every time the leaders of the Church of England show off publicly, the victims who they have harmed and silenced and families of those who have died as a result, are made to suffer again, as they are doing today in Welby and his gang interfering in the assisted dying bill and showing off about the environment. The leaders of the Church of England with their palaces to heat and their flash cars, their wealth and their servants and estate and everything that they use, are not in any position try to preach about the environment or claim to set an example. 

The Church of England, in their current state, have no place in Society. They can't set an example in any subject, if and when they do try they are seen as hypocrites. They incessantly voice their views in the Press, where other charities are ignored or turned away for press releases. the Church of England are relevant for worship to less than 2% of the population, their safeguarding record is atrocious, what is known of it, because of course they forcibly silence many many people. They cannot tell the people or England or further afield how to live because they don't set an example. 

The use of non-disclosure orders the headlines several years ago, when a woman in Birmingham was silenced over abuse by a vicar. More recently when the use of non-disclosure orders in the Church of England made headline, the Archbishop of Canterbury denied all knowledge of it, even though he couldn't have not known about the Birmingham headline and the very serious case where Justin Welby himself was involved in silencing a victim. Can the head of a charity really be credible if he claims not to know about the corrupt practices within his charity, even though it's not possible for him not to have known? the big question in conclusion is, the charity commission know all of this, why are they refusing to act? 

And of course, just part of a bigger picture so big but I can't possibly cover it in a four part complaint. In light of this, and the fact that this spanning decades almost without limit, wouldn't it be a good idea for the charity commission to suspend and restrict the Church of England's access to vulnerable groups, care home settings, charities, outreach services, schools, and all organisations which the Church of England feed off and used for PR in order to justify their existence, until proper systemic investigation and discipline Church of England has been carried out? It makes no sense to let a racist, misogynistic, ableist abusive charity like the church of England to continue when you would close any other charity for the same offences. 

If you continue to fail to act. You will be responsible for further deaths. The coroner in the Griffin case showed immense courage in refusing to bow to Church of England interference and highlighting the interference. Socialite Bishop Sarah Mullaly is used to showing off about being able to conflict every authority, as mentioned to you by an abuse victim previously, she must have got the shock of her life to be stood up to by a non-freemason, non-Anglican with no partiality for the Church of England at all.

 The Church emergency action will to make sure one of their own coroners is in place next time. The coroners report was sent to you - you won't act on it, and it was sent to Welby so he could drivel crocodile tears all over the general public and wipe his snotty nose all over them. The coroner acted in good faith and did a stunning job of being one of the first officials ever to impartially and objectively shame the Church of England and highlight their interference in her work. No one dares, so rapes and deaths will continue in the c of e until you do your job. 

How many deaths will it take to force you to regulate the Church? Why did you look on while our friend was driven to death when you were made amply aware of the serious and dangerous criminal misconduct in the c of e? You let them deliberately harm someone. 

In the recent Janner report published by the iicsa who also protected the Church of England, it was claimed that the victims were disbelieved because of their status and the poor old police didn't have a vested interest in protecting Janner. All of these  public abuse reports defer to the police and don't make them accountable. The UK police are as unaccountable as the Church of England and work closely to shield the Church and their crimes, but members of the public as well as children in care reported Janner and met with deliberate obstruction. As a result, Janner died having had a good life, while his victims suffered and saw him showing off as the benevolent public figure with all the PR as Welby and friends do, Jimmy Savile also comes to mind, some victims died as a result. You and Justin Welby are the police and Janner all over again, it's not disbelief, it's deliberate protection and it is s leading to suffering and death. 

As a result of the above statement, I will publish and share this first part of the complaint, as deaths and resulting loss of records back before emails and Internet protected Janner but as the Church of England situation continues, I want a public record of what I have written and I'm not obliged to fulfil any requirements in order for you to action my complaint. I am one of the many complainants who you have failed and refused, our perished friend is another, and its time for an external record for a future public inquiry.

If you want my address and that gets into the hands of the Church of England, we will be at risk as our friend was while you looked on because the Church of England kill, with the help of their conflicted local authorities. You don't need an address in order to action such a serious evidenced formal complaint. Each day that passes is a day with lives at risk. Wake up and act. 

Before I go, can you force the Church of England to rip up the PR speech that whines about 'brave' victims, every time the Church of England paedophile are actually caught. Its an insult, especially after the first 5 hundred repeats. 

John Carter (&friends and family).