I am writing regarding the safeguarding matter of your publication of Justin Welby's every whim and fancy. I am sure that you are aware that Mr Welby is under investigation for harm to abuse survivors. Although the headlines on that were muted, unlike many by the c of e where they use abuse and misconduct as a bizarre boast.
An individual or body under investigation should not have the privilege of press limelight it is a safeguarding failure as it distresses victims. Sadly Welby's recent blaring is considered to be a warm up act before weeks of this slurry because of the synod and then the release of the conflicted redacted compromised iicsa report. The iicsa have failed to rein in the church's incessant irrelevant splattering in the paper despite the distress to victims.
And the thing is Welby didn't even have anything relevant to say, his whole compromised career as archbishop, he has tried to use public feeling in order to gain glory, he looks where people are heading and tries to rush to lead them while they turn away in disgust, popular opinion is that he's a charlatan and a hypocrite, as you will have seen on the comments - it is too late for him to change his image and curry favour ahead of the iicsa, which is all his stunt was about.
Over the summer, whoever at the Telegraph is bankrolled by Welby or his powerful sponsors was obviously away. We had some refreshing truths about the centralized monster power hungry church. The failed CDM and the suffering of victims, the faked new CDM which is no better - was that the Telegraph? The c of e policy is that when they are shown up, they pretend to change, waste a lot of money and time and return to business as usual.
Simon Butler's representation of the archbishops council in his out of touch rant in the Telegraph spoke volumes. That is the c of e, not fake care for a public that they are too far above to know.
As Welby rants, his extreme irony is lost on him, he and his cloned daughter, the Bishop of London trying to tell the government to decentralize when he has spent 7 years turning the church into a centralised unchallenged unregulated monster of power while parish churches die is hysterical. He really is without insight and seems awash in his own imagined importance.
During the recent crisis the c of e have provided nothing for their flock and Welby banned priests from entering their own churches. The c of e became purely centralized, with Welby having to advertise his vanity show from his kitchen in advance to get the voyeurs' viewings. Every time we wonder how much lower he can go, he surprises us.
The c of e response to the pandemic was closure of churches, boasts about closure of churches, hiding their wealth in the Tower rather than helping those hit by crisis, Welby's pitiful kitchen stunt, etc. The Telegraph briefly seemed to turn over a new leaf by exposing some of the idiocy of the church and by enabling thousands of people to comment about it. But now whoever the church pays for telegraph publicity is back from holiday and we have the paradoxical hypocritical Welby saying 'don't do as I do, do as I say' , and however bad the situation is, a man guilty of what Welby is guilty of, is in no position to lay down the law.
The Bishop of London was elected as a virtue signaller, a sickly sweet false advert in a patriarchal church who would have been forced to have female bishops by the government if they had failed to agree. Her communications team, paid for by innocent communicants is a professional disaster management team on call 24 hours a day, indicating that something has gone seriously wrong. What would Jesus think?
The Bishop of London is complicit in one of the biggest cover-ups in the c of e and at the expense of a vulnerable life, one that her pseudo dad, Welby is responsible for, she keeps up a constant show of how the church conflict the police, judiciary, the NHS and more, to assure church victims that they have nowhere to turn for safety.
It appears as the church declines that she will be the next archbishop, she's so similar to Welby in crawling, lack of conscience, virtue signalling and making the church about show and interference while killing all signs of Christianity.
Welby's sponsors will love her and have presumably groomed her for archbishop, but neither of them, nor their sect, are relevant to the general public any more. It is a bit like the prime minister claiming to be medically trained.
Only the senior clergy have knowingly harmed the vulnerable while preaching at the government the general public and their rapidly departing flock. They really can't see themselves, can they?
Back to safeguarding, as this is is a safeguarding complaint. On the grounds of this complaint, can the synods bowel movements not be reported on, as it is all fakery, not news and distressing to victims and an annoyance to the general public. Further to that, the release of the iicsa report will enduce huge slurry spatterings of lies and fake sorrow, repentance and 'lessons learned' even though the church have been asked to stop using that falsehood tired term. Lessons haven't been learned, ever, that is why the telegraph is still producing slurry from Welby when his resignation is 7 years overdue and his is guilty of abuses.
Lessons don't need to be learned while that corporation hides behind powerful lawyers and disaster management firms paid for from the money of innocent communicants, what would Jesus think?
In 2013 the Telegraph published one of Welby's first glory stunts, a fake apology to a victim alonside a whitewash report that covered up for wrongdoers at the expense of the victim, the start of the false safeguarding game where Welby and Paul Butler tried to use church abuse as a kind of grotesque advert for the church, full of pride and arrogance and without understanding of the impact on victims.
The lengths to the mishandling of this case by Welby, Butler and others goes to extremes, because they have had the victim forcibly silenced to avoid justice for what amounts to criminal misconduct on their part.
The telegraph published the whitewash and false apology as a press release for Welby but refused to respond to the victim as their publication destroyed her life. Paul Butler's press input on the whole matter was to claim to be 'praying for everyone involved' a lame and useless summary of his safeguarding training and experience, showing his unsuitability as he allowed the press and defendants to rip the vulnerable adult victim to shreds for years on end after the Telegraph article. The church provided no safety or representation for the victim.
Welby, Butler and all involved , ignored all correspondence from the victim as she screamed for help, they left her unprotected to basically be killed by their manufactured hatred against her and carried out further openly conflicted and malicious reports to protect all wrongdoers in the case, excluding and ignoring the victim's pleas for this to stop. Her story was excluded. They had relied on the victim, homeless because of their previous destruction of her, and very vulnerable, to have no voice or representation while they had plenty of biased and well paid representation, including Sarah Mullally's disaster management firm who they use whenever they go too far in their dangerous behavior.
It was a pure and open whitewash and no one, no authority, from the house of lords to the police will or would challenge the church of England, even when begged by the victim, indeed these bodies aid and abet such matters on behalf of the church routinely, even the two church abuse charities in England are run by the c of e for their protection and acted for them.
A former police officer defended the victim against press led hatred and lies for three years until the stress of one onslaught caused his collapse. The victim was left to continue to be destroyed by the merciless church and press. Imagine, the church didn't envisage anyone defending the victim, she should have been disposed of more easily and less expensively.
Welby ended the investigation by apologizing publicly to the defendant just as he had to the victim at the beginning, no warning to the victim, not a murmur from the press on this and the other unexplained paradoxes similar to this throughout, because no one has investigated, the press aided Welby in this 'final' destruction aimed at causing the suicide of the victim. At the same time, the Bishop of Winchester tried to hide the injunction that the Victim had taken against him by discrediting the victim.
The national safeguarding team and archbishops council were fully involved and the national safeguarding team actively tried to silence the victim while failing to act on the safeguarding failure, they even paid a psychologist to 'advise' them and thus anyone who contacted them about the travesty, to 'ignore' the victim. What a serious and illegal abuse, both the psychologist and the safeguarding team have yet to be arrested.
As the victim continued to ask for justice, the embarrassed church had her violently brutalized and imprisoned for 'harassment' despite what they did to her, leaving her homeless and seriously injured. As she remains, this victim who you published Welby's fake apology to.
Welby and Peter Hancock, the next fake safeguarding lead, made a big show in the press about employing the lead defendant under them despite his actions making him a safeguarding risk, the thing is, he never turned up, after a proud and showy resignation from his post. But the press never investigate these things. Hancock basically turned safeguarding into a joke with his part in the whitewash.
Lord Faulkner, one of the church's unregulated cover up team recently highlighted his and others abuse of power in this case by a tirade in the press and lords in favour of the defendant, he praised the archbishop for his horrendous action in apologizing to the defendant, and still nothing is done. The leader of the Lords is afraid to act despite receiving multiple complaints as the church and their stooges ate dangerously unregulated.
The Bishop of London was contacted about this case in 2017 and actively refused to take action. She has had no credibility since then but like Welby, she goes on and on...and on and on. Is she also bankrolled by the oligarchy and their chosen figurehead when Welby can no longer be sustained in his madness?
The Telegraph investigation team have been asked but don't dare to challenge the oligarchy who are paying for Welby to destroy the church and interfere in Brexit, general elections etc, even though it is such very open corruption and they certainly don't want to investigate the Telegraph. But if the Telegraph want to persist in covering Welby's displays at the expense of victims they need to balance it with investigation into this.
The new safeguarding leads have received my complaint but like Paul Butler, they took their positions for acclaim and not with the intention of safeguarding. Like Butler and most in the c of e, safeguarding is another word for cover up and get paid for it, win-win.
They have been unable to respond to the complaint at all, at one point one of them tried to refer me to an advisor connected with the archbishops council despite the fact that I am one of the official complaints against the archbishops council. And that is the c of e.
One of the safeguarding leads is a subordinate of the Bishop involved in the case mentioned above as well as being the third safeguarding bishop connected to that diocese and case, and no improvement in diocese safeguarding has been made in decades, several safeguarding officials in a row in that diocese were involved in destroying the victim above through lies to the police to cause her wrongful violent arrest.
Jonathan Gibb, the main safeguarding lead is failing miserably because he treats safeguarding as Paul Butler did, as a game to play to the press. He is failing to address Welby's compromised position and the case mentioned. The situation is so dire that two clergy who attacked the victim in the case above in the media are involved with other victims bringing the case against the archbishops council.
Could the Telegraph please stop aiding abuse and publishing these compromised senior clergy? They are unelected and their opinion is not news. They are failed ministers of religion and their sponsors use them in their unregulated positions to interfere in whatever they have an interest in, meanwhile the actual church has collapsed, causing huge hurt to the elderly congregation.
A solution would be for the oligarchy to separate the archbishop and his senior clergy and council from the church as a kind of political party without an interest in human wellbeing and let annual moderators be selected by the people to run the church. The Pharisees tried to make Church about politics and Jesus said it wasn't what He required. The archbishop has set himself up against Jesus and Christians as thousands of abandoned flock mention when the church abuses the press.
The church of England as a cult of less than 800,000 isn't really camouflage for the wickedness and corruption of its leaders any more. Other cults with dying congregation and closed buildings aren't allowed to preen in the spotlight so these rich spoilt guilty old nuisances shouldn't either.
Finally, Welby has pulled some nauseating stunts in his time, his ego must have a house of its own, but one of his worst was his safeguarding failure of the vanity shot where he faked helping on coronavirus wards in order to gain glory for himself, he breached lockdown while refusing to let his clergy offer spiritual support to congregation, he conveniently forgot his previous claim of pneumonia for his ghoulish act, the nhs failed to act on it and on his history of safeguarding failure, pneumonia and mental illness, and then his personal assistant nearly died of coronavirus and refuses to return to work.
Further information on the matter is available on my blog johniancarter.blogspot.com
Also see 'Surviving Church' written by a retired clergyman.
Now the process for silencing the victims is to make them out to be insane, I await the same treatment, from an archbishop who has tried to glorify himself over mental health and curry pity for himself by announcing his illness at the same time as he and his council have branded victims as insane.
Report on some of this, Telegraph. And you and the church need to start reading and keeping in mind the comments from your readers on the church's vanity displays. We don't need a month of slurry splattering from the failed and dying church.f
regards,
John Carter
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.