Response to Synod September 2020 Presd

Dear Ruth Mawhinney,

I am writing regarding the IT failure at Lambeth Palace. I have a few points to make and will send this to  a number of people. But as head of IT you should receive it first.

I am sure you are aware that the archbishops and their council and staff send circular emails round demeaning abuse victims, encouraging them to be treated as insane and ignored but this week the IT systems have obviously failed.

Poor Mr Welby and Mr Cottrell,seemingly not knowing how to post letters, maybe the pandemic closed the post office, and without their computers working, sent a personal letter to their Bishops via the press in the hope that all their Bishops read the UK gutter press.

The general public are not interested in the church's circulars, it would be like Morrison's or the BBC publishing their staff circulars only have more patrons. So this error needs to stop.

The letter, seemingly dated some months ago, talks of 'How the church can come out stronger' from the pandemic. Sadly with that letter misaddressed to the press, it didn't arrive at the various Bishops palaces in time and churches remained closed for months on end, thinking that they were under Justin Welby's orders, Vicars thought they were banned from their own church because of your IT failure and Mr Welby thinking that his letter would reach his Bishops via the press in time.

The church lost thousands of congregants and will come out of this pandemic significantly weakened and with a very damaged image and credibility as a result of these failures.

 Its a pity that your faulty IT system prevented the letter from reaching the church in March or April at the start of the lockdown via email. 

Many who have abandoned the church, including including lifelong congregants in their 80s and church officers, will not be back. In fact it has done good by bringing many back to Bible based churches and away from the rotten Marxist c of e. It appears that while I have conversed with many of those leaving the C of E, the Archbishops couldn't be bothered.

The IT failures extend to York. I recently made a formal misconduct complaint to the Archbishop of York about the Archbishop of Canterbury and his serious and deliberate harm to an abuse victim to protect the church's image, and the IT glitch kicked in again as I appear to be blocked. But he received the complaint, and having already been in trouble for failure to process complaints, he is now compromised again as he hasn't responded.

Someone else commented last night about being blocked by the archbishop of York for making a safeguarding complaint. You must get the IT systems sorted out.

The complaint was made to York after Jonathan Gibbs and the other 'safeguarding' Bishops tried to ignore it because it involves Justin Welby and senior bishops endangering lives to cover up abuse. As untouchable as a certain prince. one life remains in danger as a result, an emergency but the c of e can't face it. Their sluggish reaction indicates complicity or serious lack of understanding of safeguarding.

And today we have another IT glitch, the church's private business splattered into the press to distress all the victims unjustly denied justice, a voice and compensation.

This time the IT glitch is that it is a repeat of the February synod slurry spreading in the press, the routine distressing of victims over pretences of safeguarding and care for victims spewed into the press to advertise the church and falsify care. That repeat sendout of out of date material should have been fixed when Mr Welby did the repeat of the wonga stunt .

It remains that the church have and continue to, silence victims and their advocates such as myself and make us out to be insane, and continue to be cruel and barbaric while using safeguarding as a falsehood in the press. 

The repeat, more desperate this time, of the February falsehoods, and making the Archbishops council prominent, is to do with the upcoming IICSA report, the powerful corrupt church's fear, and the fact that the Archbishops council are under formal complaints from victims, including complaints to the Charity commission. They were told what to vote, for the press release.

The behavior of the Archbishops council to abuse victims has been barbaric and sadistic. They hate anyone who rocks the boat, rocks their illusion that their untouchable power and money position is Christianity.

Who will be monitoring the administration of compensation and 'care' and what about the victims who have been labelled insane by the Archbishops for being persistent in asking for justice? Will they remain outcast and suffering.

Victims shouldn't have to turn vigilante. That is the real statement of the c of e safeguarding situation, and making such desperation into insanity is an even louder statement.

What about the victim who Welby was congratulated by Lord Faulks and Lady Butler Sloss for spending a million or so on silencing and destroying to protect the powerful men who finance the church? I am sure that the excuses will continue and the imaginary budget will never reach victims but the spiel will be repeated for as many synods as the press will repeat it. Victims will also be traumatized by the massive slurry splattering in response to the IICSA report.

The press release due is the resignation of both Archbishops with a message of true sorrow, not the usual fake apology. And a promise of change.

The press reprinted the regurgitation of February's pretence. The victims denied justice have been subjected to another traumatic slurry splattering synod of lies in the press. And Justin Welby's overdue resignation, expected at every synod for his lawless and alarming unstable behavior, still has not been issued.

For the sake of the victims. Please make sure that your IT systems are fixed and we don't see the press full of out of date unquestioned lies. Justin Welby's actions in fake safeguarding have nearly killed people, he is without remorse, his guilty council the same, and how can a church operate safely under a man and council like that? 

The only thing sustaining them is the thin illusion that keeps a majority of the elderly communicants in their thrall but the general public are increasingly unhappy.

The media may drink in the church's repetitive lies, but they are an insult to the victims. An insult that the church are constantly reminded by victims is inappropriate and serves only the church. So, please fix your faulty systems.

Regards,

John Carter